FSK
Price
$20.04
Change
+$0.59 (+3.03%)
Updated
May 8 closing price
Capitalization
5.31B
94 days until earnings call
GECC
Price
$10.87
Change
+$0.05 (+0.46%)
Updated
May 8, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
100.86M
84 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

FSK vs GECC

Header iconFSK vs GECC Comparison
Open Charts FSK vs GECCBanner chart's image
FS KKR Capital
Price$20.04
Change+$0.59 (+3.03%)
Volume$1.31M
Capitalization5.31B
Great Elm Capital
Price$10.87
Change+$0.05 (+0.46%)
Volume$230
Capitalization100.86M
FSK vs GECC Comparison Chart
Loading...
FSK
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
GECC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FSK vs. GECC commentary
May 09, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSK is a Buy and GECC is a Buy.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
May 09, 2025
Stock price -- (FSK: $20.04 vs. GECC: $10.82)
Brand notoriety: FSK and GECC are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Managers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FSK: 57% vs. GECC: 270%
Market capitalization -- FSK: $5.31B vs. GECC: $100.86M
FSK [@Investment Managers] is valued at $5.31B. GECC’s [@Investment Managers] market capitalization is $100.86M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Managers] industry ranges from $124.17B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Managers] industry is $5.99B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FSK’s FA Score shows that 4 FA rating(s) are green whileGECC’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • FSK’s FA Score: 4 green, 1 red.
  • GECC’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, FSK is a better buy in the long-term than GECC.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FSK’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while GECC’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FSK’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • GECC’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, FSK is a better buy in the short-term than GECC.

Price Growth

FSK (@Investment Managers) experienced а +2.30% price change this week, while GECC (@Investment Managers) price change was +6.86% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Managers industry was +1.36%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +26.65%, and the average quarterly price growth was +4.16%.

Reported Earning Dates

FSK is expected to report earnings on Aug 11, 2025.

GECC is expected to report earnings on Jul 31, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Managers (+1.36% weekly)

Investment Managers manage financial assets and other investments of clients. Management includes designing a short- or long-term strategy for buying/holding and selling of portfolio holdings. It can also include tax services and other aspects of financial planning as well. While it is perceived that the industry is faced with growing competition from robo-advisors/digital platforms and passive/ index-tracking funds, many investors still find value in actively managed in-person services that investment management companies often emphasize on. At the same time, many wealth managers are also incorporating digital initiatives/low cost options in addition to their in-person customized services. Their main sources of revenues are fees as a percentage of assets under management, in addition to a certain portion of clients’ gains from asset appreciation. BlackRock, Inc., Blackstone Group Inc and Brookfield Asset Management are some of the major investment management companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSK($5.31B) has a higher market cap than GECC($101M). FSK has higher P/E ratio than GECC: FSK (7.65) vs GECC (3.20). GECC YTD gains are higher at: 1.967 vs. FSK (-4.592). FSK has more cash in the bank: 223M vs. GECC (33.4M). GECC has less debt than FSK: GECC (140M) vs FSK (8.19B). FSK has higher revenues than GECC: FSK (779M) vs GECC (30.2M).
FSKGECCFSK / GECC
Capitalization5.31B101M5,257%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD-4.5921.967-233%
P/E Ratio7.653.20239%
Revenue779M30.2M2,579%
Total Cash223M33.4M668%
Total Debt8.19B140M5,848%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FSK vs GECC: Fundamental Ratings
FSK
GECC
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
929
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
3
Undervalued
4
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
1276
SMR RATING
1..100
847
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5543
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
262
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
4965

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

FSK's Valuation (3) in the null industry is in the same range as GECC (4). This means that FSK’s stock grew similarly to GECC’s over the last 12 months.

FSK's Profit vs Risk Rating (12) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for GECC (76). This means that FSK’s stock grew somewhat faster than GECC’s over the last 12 months.

FSK's SMR Rating (8) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for GECC (47). This means that FSK’s stock grew somewhat faster than GECC’s over the last 12 months.

GECC's Price Growth Rating (43) in the null industry is in the same range as FSK (55). This means that GECC’s stock grew similarly to FSK’s over the last 12 months.

GECC's P/E Growth Rating (2) in the null industry is in the same range as FSK (26). This means that GECC’s stock grew similarly to FSK’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FSKGECC
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
58%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
56%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
55%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
52%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
61%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
68%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
44%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
58%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
57%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
59%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
56%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
61%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
46%
Bearish Trend 16 days ago
60%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
64%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
49%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
31%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
40%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
FSK
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
GECC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
PILBF0.990.03
+3.66%
PILBARA MINERALS LTD
AONNY30.360.55
+1.83%
Aeon Co. Ltd.
GLNCY6.640.09
+1.37%
Glencore Plc
FBAK249.002.03
+0.82%
First National Bank Alaska
OTLC0.06N/A
N/A
Oncotelic Therapeutics, Inc.

GECC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that GECC and NMFC have been poorly correlated (+32% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that GECC and NMFC's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GECC
1D Price
Change %
GECC100%
+2.32%
NMFC - GECC
32%
Poorly correlated
+0.79%
BCSF - GECC
31%
Poorly correlated
-3.85%
MRCC - GECC
30%
Poorly correlated
-0.86%
TCPC - GECC
30%
Poorly correlated
-1.64%
MFIC - GECC
30%
Poorly correlated
+0.42%
More