FSK
Price
$18.72
Change
+$0.05 (+0.27%)
Updated
Apr 11 closing price
Capitalization
5.31B
25 days until earnings call
MSDL
Price
$18.50
Change
+$0.37 (+2.04%)
Updated
Apr 11 closing price
Capitalization
1.92B
26 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

FSK vs MSDL

Header iconFSK vs MSDL Comparison
Open Charts FSK vs MSDLBanner chart's image
FS KKR Capital
Price$18.72
Change+$0.05 (+0.27%)
Volume$3.17M
Capitalization5.31B
Morgan Stanley Direct Lending Fund
Price$18.50
Change+$0.37 (+2.04%)
Volume$562.63K
Capitalization1.92B
FSK vs MSDL Comparison Chart
Loading...
FSK
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MSDL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FSK vs. MSDL commentary
Apr 12, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSK is a Hold and MSDL is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Apr 12, 2025
Stock price -- (FSK: $18.72 vs. MSDL: $18.50)
Brand notoriety: FSK and MSDL are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Managers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FSK: 136% vs. MSDL: 80%
Market capitalization -- FSK: $5.31B vs. MSDL: $1.92B
FSK [@Investment Managers] is valued at $5.31B. MSDL’s [@Investment Managers] market capitalization is $1.92B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Managers] industry ranges from $124.17B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Managers] industry is $5.99B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FSK’s FA Score shows that 4 FA rating(s) are green whileMSDL’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • FSK’s FA Score: 4 green, 1 red.
  • MSDL’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, FSK is a better buy in the long-term than MSDL.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FSK’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MSDL’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FSK’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • MSDL’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, FSK is a better buy in the short-term than MSDL.

Price Growth

FSK (@Investment Managers) experienced а -3.55% price change this week, while MSDL (@Investment Managers) price change was -1.39% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Managers industry was -0.84%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -6.22%, and the average quarterly price growth was -6.52%.

Reported Earning Dates

FSK is expected to report earnings on Aug 11, 2025.

MSDL is expected to report earnings on May 08, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Managers (-0.84% weekly)

Investment Managers manage financial assets and other investments of clients. Management includes designing a short- or long-term strategy for buying/holding and selling of portfolio holdings. It can also include tax services and other aspects of financial planning as well. While it is perceived that the industry is faced with growing competition from robo-advisors/digital platforms and passive/ index-tracking funds, many investors still find value in actively managed in-person services that investment management companies often emphasize on. At the same time, many wealth managers are also incorporating digital initiatives/low cost options in addition to their in-person customized services. Their main sources of revenues are fees as a percentage of assets under management, in addition to a certain portion of clients’ gains from asset appreciation. BlackRock, Inc., Blackstone Group Inc and Brookfield Asset Management are some of the major investment management companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSK($5.31B) has a higher market cap than MSDL($1.92B). MSDL has higher P/E ratio than FSK: MSDL (8.24) vs FSK (7.65). MSDL YTD gains are higher at: -8.235 vs. FSK (-10.876). FSK has more cash in the bank: 223M vs. MSDL (88.1M). MSDL has less debt than FSK: MSDL (1.5B) vs FSK (8.19B). FSK has higher revenues than MSDL: FSK (779M) vs MSDL (257M).
FSKMSDLFSK / MSDL
Capitalization5.31B1.92B277%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD-10.876-8.235132%
P/E Ratio7.658.2493%
Revenue779M257M303%
Total Cash223M88.1M253%
Total Debt8.19B1.5B547%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FSK: Fundamental Ratings
FSK
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
67
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
3
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
8
SMR RATING
1..100
8
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
58
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
28
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FSKMSDL
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
73%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
75%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
73%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
50%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
43%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
24%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
44%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
38%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
45%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
30%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
41%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
31%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 19 days ago
57%
Bullish Trend 26 days ago
43%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
46%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
31%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
64%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
63%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
45%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
FSK
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MSDL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
DISV28.260.77
+2.80%
Dimensional International Sm Cp Val ETF
QQQS21.150.54
+2.62%
Invesco NASDAQ Future Gen 200 ETF
FICS36.570.89
+2.49%
First Trust Intl Developed Cap Strth ETF
BDRY5.630.03
+0.54%
Breakwave Dry Bulk Shipping ETF
IBMO25.350.03
+0.12%
iShares iBonds Dec 2026 Term Muni Bd ETF

MSDL and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MSDL has been loosely correlated with BCSF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 42% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if MSDL jumps, then BCSF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MSDL
1D Price
Change %
MSDL100%
+2.04%
BCSF - MSDL
42%
Loosely correlated
-0.14%
CSWC - MSDL
42%
Loosely correlated
+0.53%
ARCC - MSDL
41%
Loosely correlated
+0.35%
SLRC - MSDL
39%
Loosely correlated
+1.00%
FSK - MSDL
39%
Loosely correlated
+0.27%
More