FSK
Price
$19.66
Change
-$1.07 (-5.16%)
Updated
Apr 4, 04:30 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
5.31B
33 days until earnings call
NMFC
Price
$10.01
Change
-$0.69 (-6.45%)
Updated
Apr 4, 02:46 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
1.34B
38 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

FSK vs NMFC

Header iconFSK vs NMFC Comparison
Open Charts FSK vs NMFCBanner chart's image
FS KKR Capital
Price$19.66
Change-$1.07 (-5.16%)
Volume$1.9K
Capitalization5.31B
New Mountain Finance
Price$10.01
Change-$0.69 (-6.45%)
Volume$100
Capitalization1.34B
FSK vs NMFC Comparison Chart
Loading...
FSK
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
NMFC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FSK vs. NMFC commentary
Apr 04, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSK is a Hold and NMFC is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Apr 04, 2025
Stock price -- (FSK: $20.73 vs. NMFC: $10.70)
Brand notoriety: FSK and NMFC are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Managers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FSK: 137% vs. NMFC: 226%
Market capitalization -- FSK: $5.31B vs. NMFC: $1.34B
FSK [@Investment Managers] is valued at $5.31B. NMFC’s [@Investment Managers] market capitalization is $1.34B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Managers] industry ranges from $124.17B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Managers] industry is $5.99B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FSK’s FA Score shows that 4 FA rating(s) are green whileNMFC’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • FSK’s FA Score: 4 green, 1 red.
  • NMFC’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, FSK is a better buy in the long-term than NMFC.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FSK’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while NMFC’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FSK’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • NMFC’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, FSK is a better buy in the short-term than NMFC.

Price Growth

FSK (@Investment Managers) experienced а -1.71% price change this week, while NMFC (@Investment Managers) price change was -3.60% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Managers industry was -3.85%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -4.54%, and the average quarterly price growth was -3.92%.

Reported Earning Dates

FSK is expected to report earnings on May 07, 2025.

NMFC is expected to report earnings on May 12, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Managers (-3.85% weekly)

Investment Managers manage financial assets and other investments of clients. Management includes designing a short- or long-term strategy for buying/holding and selling of portfolio holdings. It can also include tax services and other aspects of financial planning as well. While it is perceived that the industry is faced with growing competition from robo-advisors/digital platforms and passive/ index-tracking funds, many investors still find value in actively managed in-person services that investment management companies often emphasize on. At the same time, many wealth managers are also incorporating digital initiatives/low cost options in addition to their in-person customized services. Their main sources of revenues are fees as a percentage of assets under management, in addition to a certain portion of clients’ gains from asset appreciation. BlackRock, Inc., Blackstone Group Inc and Brookfield Asset Management are some of the major investment management companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSK($5.31B) has a higher market cap than NMFC($1.34B). NMFC has higher P/E ratio than FSK: NMFC (10.15) vs FSK (7.65). FSK YTD gains are higher at: -1.307 vs. NMFC (-2.168). NMFC has less debt than FSK: NMFC (1.79B) vs FSK (8.19B). FSK has higher revenues than NMFC: FSK (779M) vs NMFC (144M).
FSKNMFCFSK / NMFC
Capitalization5.31B1.34B397%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD-1.307-2.16860%
P/E Ratio7.6510.1575%
Revenue779M144M541%
Total Cash223MN/A-
Total Debt8.19B1.79B459%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FSK vs NMFC: Fundamental Ratings
FSK
NMFC
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
6470
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
3
Undervalued
4
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
630
SMR RATING
1..100
1127
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4871
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1941
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a15

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

FSK's Valuation (3) in the null industry is in the same range as NMFC (4). This means that FSK’s stock grew similarly to NMFC’s over the last 12 months.

FSK's Profit vs Risk Rating (6) in the null industry is in the same range as NMFC (30). This means that FSK’s stock grew similarly to NMFC’s over the last 12 months.

FSK's SMR Rating (11) in the null industry is in the same range as NMFC (27). This means that FSK’s stock grew similarly to NMFC’s over the last 12 months.

FSK's Price Growth Rating (48) in the null industry is in the same range as NMFC (71). This means that FSK’s stock grew similarly to NMFC’s over the last 12 months.

FSK's P/E Growth Rating (19) in the null industry is in the same range as NMFC (41). This means that FSK’s stock grew similarly to NMFC’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FSKNMFC
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
86%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
39%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
50%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
37%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
38%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
44%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
37%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
41%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
33%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
57%
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
43%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
45%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
37%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
52%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
44%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
FSK
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
NMFC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
FUMB20.150.04
+0.20%
First Trust Ultra Short Dur Muncpl ETF
BME38.15-0.27
-0.70%
Blackrock Health Sciences Trust
ASHR26.18-0.27
-1.02%
Xtrackers Harvest CSI 300 China A ETF
UJUN32.15-1.28
-3.83%
Innovator U.S. Equity Ultra BffrETF™-Jun
LRND30.63-1.48
-4.60%
NYLI U.S. Large Cap R&D Leaders ETF

NMFC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, NMFC has been loosely correlated with MAIN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 60% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if NMFC jumps, then MAIN could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To NMFC
1D Price
Change %
NMFC100%
-2.37%
MAIN - NMFC
60%
Loosely correlated
-2.68%
FSK - NMFC
60%
Loosely correlated
-2.63%
TSLX - NMFC
58%
Loosely correlated
-2.59%
ARCC - NMFC
57%
Loosely correlated
-3.97%
SLRC - NMFC
57%
Loosely correlated
-1.85%
More