Advertisement
FSK vs NMFC
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSK is a Buy and NMFC is a StrongBuy.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
FSK’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileNMFC’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).
- FSK’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
- NMFC’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
FSK’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while NMFC’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).
- FSK’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
- NMFC’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 3 bearish.
Price Growth
FSK (@Investment Managers) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while NMFC (@Investment Managers) price change was -1.03% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Managers industry was -0.17%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +8.40%, and the average quarterly price growth was +2.35%.
Reported Earning Dates
FSK is expected to report earnings on Aug 11, 2025.
NMFC is expected to report earnings on Jul 30, 2025.
Industries' Descriptions
@Investment Managers (-0.17% weekly)Investment Managers manage financial assets and other investments of clients. Management includes designing a short- or long-term strategy for buying/holding and selling of portfolio holdings. It can also include tax services and other aspects of financial planning as well. While it is perceived that the industry is faced with growing competition from robo-advisors/digital platforms and passive/ index-tracking funds, many investors still find value in actively managed in-person services that investment management companies often emphasize on. At the same time, many wealth managers are also incorporating digital initiatives/low cost options in addition to their in-person customized services. Their main sources of revenues are fees as a percentage of assets under management, in addition to a certain portion of clients’ gains from asset appreciation. BlackRock, Inc., Blackstone Group Inc and Brookfield Asset Management are some of the major investment management companies.
| FSK | NMFC | FSK / NMFC | |
| Capitalization | 5.31B | 1.34B | 397% |
| EBITDA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Gain YTD | -0.640 | -3.082 | 21% |
| P/E Ratio | 7.65 | 10.15 | 75% |
| Revenue | 779M | 144M | 541% |
| Total Cash | 223M | N/A | - |
| Total Debt | 8.19B | 1.79B | 459% |
FSK | NMFC | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 17 | 22 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 4 Undervalued | 4 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 9 | 13 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 100 | 100 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 49 | 53 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 20 | 57 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | 75 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
FSK's Valuation (4) in the null industry is in the same range as NMFC (4). This means that FSK’s stock grew similarly to NMFC’s over the last 12 months.
FSK's Profit vs Risk Rating (9) in the null industry is in the same range as NMFC (13). This means that FSK’s stock grew similarly to NMFC’s over the last 12 months.
FSK's SMR Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as NMFC (100). This means that FSK’s stock grew similarly to NMFC’s over the last 12 months.
FSK's Price Growth Rating (49) in the null industry is in the same range as NMFC (53). This means that FSK’s stock grew similarly to NMFC’s over the last 12 months.
FSK's P/E Growth Rating (20) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for NMFC (57). This means that FSK’s stock grew somewhat faster than NMFC’s over the last 12 months.
| FSK | NMFC | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 28% | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 42% | 1 day ago 34% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 66% | 1 day ago 41% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 61% | 1 day ago 48% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 55% | 1 day ago 38% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 57% | 1 day ago 36% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 56% | 3 days ago 41% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 21 days ago 46% | 7 days ago 38% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 29% | 1 day ago 26% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 50% | 1 day ago 30% |
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| PRFD | 49.86 | -0.18 | -0.36% |
| PIMCO Preferred and Cp Sec Act Exc-Trd | |||
| SPXN | 62.25 | -0.57 | -0.91% |
| ProShares S&P 500® ex-Financials | |||
| FBZ | 11.25 | -0.15 | -1.27% |
| First Trust Brazil AlphaDEX® ETF | |||
| IGLB | 47.55 | -0.84 | -1.74% |
| iShares 10+ Year Invmt Grd Corp Bd ETF | |||
| RMT | 8.68 | -0.18 | -2.03% |
| Royce Micro-Cap Trust | |||
FSK and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FSK has been closely correlated with ARCC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 86% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FSK jumps, then ARCC could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FSK | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FSK | 100% | -2.43% | ||
| ARCC - FSK | 86% Closely correlated | -2.09% | ||
| SLRC - FSK | 84% Closely correlated | -2.45% | ||
| MAIN - FSK | 84% Closely correlated | -2.43% | ||
| BCSF - FSK | 83% Closely correlated | -3.39% | ||
| FDUS - FSK | 83% Closely correlated | -1.96% | ||
More | ||||
NMFC and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, NMFC has been closely correlated with FSK. These tickers have moved in lockstep 79% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if NMFC jumps, then FSK could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To NMFC | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| NMFC | 100% | -2.21% | ||
| FSK - NMFC | 79% Closely correlated | -2.43% | ||
| ARCC - NMFC | 78% Closely correlated | -2.09% | ||
| TSLX - NMFC | 78% Closely correlated | -2.13% | ||
| SLRC - NMFC | 76% Closely correlated | -2.45% | ||
| BCSF - NMFC | 76% Closely correlated | -3.39% | ||
More | ||||