FSK
Price
$20.73
Change
-$0.56 (-2.63%)
Updated
Apr 3, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
5.31B
33 days until earnings call
OXSQ
Price
$2.58
Change
+$0.02 (+0.78%)
Updated
Apr 3, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
189.16M
32 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

FSK vs OXSQ

Header iconFSK vs OXSQ Comparison
Open Charts FSK vs OXSQBanner chart's image
FS KKR Capital
Price$20.73
Change-$0.56 (-2.63%)
Volume$13.94K
Capitalization5.31B
Oxford Square Capital
Price$2.58
Change+$0.02 (+0.78%)
Volume$1.57K
Capitalization189.16M
FSK vs OXSQ Comparison Chart
Loading...
FSK
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
OXSQ
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FSK vs. OXSQ commentary
Apr 04, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSK is a Buy and OXSQ is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Apr 04, 2025
Stock price -- (FSK: $21.29 vs. OXSQ: $2.56)
Brand notoriety: FSK and OXSQ are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Managers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FSK: 117% vs. OXSQ: 97%
Market capitalization -- FSK: $5.31B vs. OXSQ: $189.16M
FSK [@Investment Managers] is valued at $5.31B. OXSQ’s [@Investment Managers] market capitalization is $189.16M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Managers] industry ranges from $124.17B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Managers] industry is $5.99B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FSK’s FA Score shows that 4 FA rating(s) are green whileOXSQ’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • FSK’s FA Score: 4 green, 1 red.
  • OXSQ’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, FSK is a better buy in the long-term than OXSQ.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FSK’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while OXSQ’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FSK’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • OXSQ’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, FSK is a better buy in the short-term than OXSQ.

Price Growth

FSK (@Investment Managers) experienced а +0.14% price change this week, while OXSQ (@Investment Managers) price change was -0.39% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Managers industry was -2.96%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -3.17%, and the average quarterly price growth was -1.56%.

Reported Earning Dates

FSK is expected to report earnings on May 07, 2025.

OXSQ is expected to report earnings on May 06, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Managers (-2.96% weekly)

Investment Managers manage financial assets and other investments of clients. Management includes designing a short- or long-term strategy for buying/holding and selling of portfolio holdings. It can also include tax services and other aspects of financial planning as well. While it is perceived that the industry is faced with growing competition from robo-advisors/digital platforms and passive/ index-tracking funds, many investors still find value in actively managed in-person services that investment management companies often emphasize on. At the same time, many wealth managers are also incorporating digital initiatives/low cost options in addition to their in-person customized services. Their main sources of revenues are fees as a percentage of assets under management, in addition to a certain portion of clients’ gains from asset appreciation. BlackRock, Inc., Blackstone Group Inc and Brookfield Asset Management are some of the major investment management companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSK($5.31B) has a higher market cap than OXSQ($189M). OXSQ has higher P/E ratio than FSK: OXSQ (9.78) vs FSK (7.65). OXSQ YTD gains are higher at: 9.921 vs. FSK (1.359). FSK has more cash in the bank: 223M vs. OXSQ (954K). OXSQ has less debt than FSK: OXSQ (123M) vs FSK (8.19B). FSK has higher revenues than OXSQ: FSK (779M) vs OXSQ (22.6M).
FSKOXSQFSK / OXSQ
Capitalization5.31B189M2,810%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD1.3599.92114%
P/E Ratio7.659.7878%
Revenue779M22.6M3,447%
Total Cash223M954K23,375%
Total Debt8.19B123M6,656%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FSK vs OXSQ: Fundamental Ratings
FSK
OXSQ
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
6457
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
3
Undervalued
2
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
656
SMR RATING
1..100
1179
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4855
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
204
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

OXSQ's Valuation (2) in the null industry is in the same range as FSK (3). This means that OXSQ’s stock grew similarly to FSK’s over the last 12 months.

FSK's Profit vs Risk Rating (6) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for OXSQ (56). This means that FSK’s stock grew somewhat faster than OXSQ’s over the last 12 months.

FSK's SMR Rating (11) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for OXSQ (79). This means that FSK’s stock grew significantly faster than OXSQ’s over the last 12 months.

FSK's Price Growth Rating (48) in the null industry is in the same range as OXSQ (55). This means that FSK’s stock grew similarly to OXSQ’s over the last 12 months.

OXSQ's P/E Growth Rating (4) in the null industry is in the same range as FSK (20). This means that OXSQ’s stock grew similarly to FSK’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FSKOXSQ
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
54%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
30%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
54%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
55%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
73%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
57%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
54%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
41%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
53%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
57%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
45%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
53%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
56%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
44%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
45%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
FSK
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
OXSQ
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
RYMKX49.03N/A
N/A
Rydex Russell 2000 1.5x Strategy H
RAGTX54.77N/A
N/A
Virtus Zevenbergen Technology A
PWJAX29.84N/A
N/A
PGIM Jennison International Opps A
BUFEX50.16N/A
N/A
Buffalo Blue Chip Growth
TGDIX15.71N/A
N/A
TCW Relative Value Large Cap I

FSK and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FSK has been closely correlated with MAIN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 76% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FSK jumps, then MAIN could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FSK
1D Price
Change %
FSK100%
-0.33%
MAIN - FSK
76%
Closely correlated
-0.43%
ARCC - FSK
74%
Closely correlated
+0.54%
SLRC - FSK
71%
Closely correlated
-1.00%
FDUS - FSK
69%
Closely correlated
-0.68%
HTGC - FSK
69%
Closely correlated
-0.21%
More

OXSQ and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, OXSQ has been loosely correlated with NXDT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 44% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if OXSQ jumps, then NXDT could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To OXSQ
1D Price
Change %
OXSQ100%
+0.78%
NXDT - OXSQ
44%
Loosely correlated
-5.85%
NEWT - OXSQ
43%
Loosely correlated
-9.12%
BBDC - OXSQ
34%
Loosely correlated
-1.90%
FSK - OXSQ
32%
Poorly correlated
-2.63%
FDUS - OXSQ
31%
Poorly correlated
-1.32%
More