FSK
Price
$20.93
Change
+$0.10 (+0.48%)
Updated
May 23, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
5.31B
80 days until earnings call
OXSQ
Price
$2.35
Change
-$0.02 (-0.84%)
Updated
May 23, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
189.16M
67 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

FSK vs OXSQ

Header iconFSK vs OXSQ Comparison
Open Charts FSK vs OXSQBanner chart's image
FS KKR Capital
Price$20.93
Change+$0.10 (+0.48%)
Volume$8.71K
Capitalization5.31B
Oxford Square Capital
Price$2.35
Change-$0.02 (-0.84%)
Volume$7.3K
Capitalization189.16M
FSK vs OXSQ Comparison Chart
Loading...
FSK
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
OXSQ
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FSK vs. OXSQ commentary
May 24, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSK is a Buy and OXSQ is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
May 24, 2025
Stock price -- (FSK: $20.83 vs. OXSQ: $2.37)
Brand notoriety: FSK and OXSQ are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Managers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FSK: 46% vs. OXSQ: 0%
Market capitalization -- FSK: $5.31B vs. OXSQ: $189.16M
FSK [@Investment Managers] is valued at $5.31B. OXSQ’s [@Investment Managers] market capitalization is $189.16M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Managers] industry ranges from $124.17B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Managers] industry is $6.1B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FSK’s FA Score shows that 4 FA rating(s) are green whileOXSQ’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • FSK’s FA Score: 4 green, 1 red.
  • OXSQ’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, FSK is a better buy in the long-term than OXSQ.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FSK’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while OXSQ’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FSK’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • OXSQ’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, FSK is a better buy in the short-term than OXSQ.

Price Growth

FSK (@Investment Managers) experienced а -0.43% price change this week, while OXSQ (@Investment Managers) price change was -3.46% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Managers industry was -1.01%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +6.03%, and the average quarterly price growth was +2.20%.

Reported Earning Dates

FSK is expected to report earnings on Aug 11, 2025.

OXSQ is expected to report earnings on Jul 29, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Managers (-1.01% weekly)

Investment Managers manage financial assets and other investments of clients. Management includes designing a short- or long-term strategy for buying/holding and selling of portfolio holdings. It can also include tax services and other aspects of financial planning as well. While it is perceived that the industry is faced with growing competition from robo-advisors/digital platforms and passive/ index-tracking funds, many investors still find value in actively managed in-person services that investment management companies often emphasize on. At the same time, many wealth managers are also incorporating digital initiatives/low cost options in addition to their in-person customized services. Their main sources of revenues are fees as a percentage of assets under management, in addition to a certain portion of clients’ gains from asset appreciation. BlackRock, Inc., Blackstone Group Inc and Brookfield Asset Management are some of the major investment management companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSK($5.31B) has a higher market cap than OXSQ($189M). OXSQ has higher P/E ratio than FSK: OXSQ (9.78) vs FSK (7.65). OXSQ YTD gains are higher at: 3.789 vs. FSK (-0.831). FSK has more cash in the bank: 223M vs. OXSQ (954K). OXSQ has less debt than FSK: OXSQ (123M) vs FSK (8.19B). FSK has higher revenues than OXSQ: FSK (779M) vs OXSQ (22.6M).
FSKOXSQFSK / OXSQ
Capitalization5.31B189M2,810%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD-0.8313.789-22%
P/E Ratio7.659.7878%
Revenue779M22.6M3,447%
Total Cash223M954K23,375%
Total Debt8.19B123M6,656%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FSK vs OXSQ: Fundamental Ratings
FSK
OXSQ
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
1467
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
4
Undervalued
2
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
938
SMR RATING
1..100
853
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5075
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
204
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

OXSQ's Valuation (2) in the null industry is in the same range as FSK (4). This means that OXSQ’s stock grew similarly to FSK’s over the last 12 months.

FSK's Profit vs Risk Rating (9) in the null industry is in the same range as OXSQ (38). This means that FSK’s stock grew similarly to OXSQ’s over the last 12 months.

FSK's SMR Rating (8) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for OXSQ (53). This means that FSK’s stock grew somewhat faster than OXSQ’s over the last 12 months.

FSK's Price Growth Rating (50) in the null industry is in the same range as OXSQ (75). This means that FSK’s stock grew similarly to OXSQ’s over the last 12 months.

OXSQ's P/E Growth Rating (4) in the null industry is in the same range as FSK (20). This means that OXSQ’s stock grew similarly to FSK’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FSKOXSQ
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
36%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
59%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
40%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
46%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
56%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
61%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
52%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
44%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
53%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
57%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
54%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
56%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
47%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
52%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
27%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
53%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
50%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
46%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FSK
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
OXSQ
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
PHYD51.340.27
+0.52%
Putnam ESG High Yield ETF
PML7.460.03
+0.40%
PIMCO Municipal Income FUND II
FLYU41.18N/A
N/A
MicroSectors™ Travel 3X Leveraged ETNs
DYTA27.49-0.06
-0.20%
SGI Dynamic Tactical ETF
DFGR26.08-0.12
-0.46%
Dimensional Global Real Estate ETF

FSK and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FSK has been closely correlated with ARCC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 86% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FSK jumps, then ARCC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FSK
1D Price
Change %
FSK100%
-0.19%
ARCC - FSK
86%
Closely correlated
-0.05%
SLRC - FSK
84%
Closely correlated
-0.31%
MAIN - FSK
84%
Closely correlated
-0.31%
BCSF - FSK
83%
Closely correlated
-0.98%
FDUS - FSK
83%
Closely correlated
N/A
More

OXSQ and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, OXSQ has been loosely correlated with PFLT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 51% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if OXSQ jumps, then PFLT could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To OXSQ
1D Price
Change %
OXSQ100%
N/A
PFLT - OXSQ
51%
Loosely correlated
N/A
FDUS - OXSQ
49%
Loosely correlated
N/A
SCM - OXSQ
48%
Loosely correlated
N/A
FSK - OXSQ
47%
Loosely correlated
-0.19%
BBDC - OXSQ
47%
Loosely correlated
N/A
More