FSK
Price
$19.91
Change
-$0.13 (-0.65%)
Updated
May 9 closing price
Capitalization
5.31B
93 days until earnings call
SSSS
Price
$5.27
Change
+$0.10 (+1.93%)
Updated
May 9 closing price
Capitalization
111.81M
88 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

FSK vs SSSS

Header iconFSK vs SSSS Comparison
Open Charts FSK vs SSSSBanner chart's image
FS KKR Capital
Price$19.91
Change-$0.13 (-0.65%)
Volume$1.26M
Capitalization5.31B
SuRo Capital
Price$5.27
Change+$0.10 (+1.93%)
Volume$78.7K
Capitalization111.81M
FSK vs SSSS Comparison Chart
Loading...
FSK
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SSSS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FSK vs. SSSS commentary
May 11, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSK is a Buy and SSSS is a Buy.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
May 11, 2025
Stock price -- (FSK: $19.91 vs. SSSS: $5.27)
Brand notoriety: FSK and SSSS are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Managers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FSK: 55% vs. SSSS: 49%
Market capitalization -- FSK: $5.31B vs. SSSS: $111.81M
FSK [@Investment Managers] is valued at $5.31B. SSSS’s [@Investment Managers] market capitalization is $111.81M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Managers] industry ranges from $124.17B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Managers] industry is $6.01B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FSK’s FA Score shows that 4 FA rating(s) are green whileSSSS’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • FSK’s FA Score: 4 green, 1 red.
  • SSSS’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, FSK is a better buy in the long-term than SSSS.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FSK’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SSSS’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FSK’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • SSSS’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, FSK is a better buy in the short-term than SSSS.

Price Growth

FSK (@Investment Managers) experienced а -0.35% price change this week, while SSSS (@Investment Managers) price change was +8.44% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Managers industry was +1.93%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +28.97%, and the average quarterly price growth was +4.59%.

Reported Earning Dates

FSK is expected to report earnings on Aug 11, 2025.

SSSS is expected to report earnings on Aug 06, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Managers (+1.93% weekly)

Investment Managers manage financial assets and other investments of clients. Management includes designing a short- or long-term strategy for buying/holding and selling of portfolio holdings. It can also include tax services and other aspects of financial planning as well. While it is perceived that the industry is faced with growing competition from robo-advisors/digital platforms and passive/ index-tracking funds, many investors still find value in actively managed in-person services that investment management companies often emphasize on. At the same time, many wealth managers are also incorporating digital initiatives/low cost options in addition to their in-person customized services. Their main sources of revenues are fees as a percentage of assets under management, in addition to a certain portion of clients’ gains from asset appreciation. BlackRock, Inc., Blackstone Group Inc and Brookfield Asset Management are some of the major investment management companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSK($5.31B) has a higher market cap than SSSS($112M). SSSS has higher P/E ratio than FSK: SSSS (23.21) vs FSK (7.65). FSK YTD gains are higher at: -5.211 vs. SSSS (-10.374). SSSS has more cash in the bank: 260M vs. FSK (223M). SSSS has less debt than FSK: SSSS (73.7M) vs FSK (8.19B). FSK has higher revenues than SSSS: FSK (779M) vs SSSS (20.2M).
FSKSSSSFSK / SSSS
Capitalization5.31B112M4,741%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD-5.211-10.37450%
P/E Ratio7.6523.2133%
Revenue779M20.2M3,856%
Total Cash223M260M86%
Total Debt8.19B73.7M11,109%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FSK vs SSSS: Fundamental Ratings
FSK
SSSS
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
1710
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
3
Undervalued
24
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
1178
SMR RATING
1..100
891
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4945
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
2698
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
4650

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

FSK's Valuation (3) in the null industry is in the same range as SSSS (24). This means that FSK’s stock grew similarly to SSSS’s over the last 12 months.

FSK's Profit vs Risk Rating (11) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for SSSS (78). This means that FSK’s stock grew significantly faster than SSSS’s over the last 12 months.

FSK's SMR Rating (8) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for SSSS (91). This means that FSK’s stock grew significantly faster than SSSS’s over the last 12 months.

SSSS's Price Growth Rating (45) in the null industry is in the same range as FSK (49). This means that SSSS’s stock grew similarly to FSK’s over the last 12 months.

FSK's P/E Growth Rating (26) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for SSSS (98). This means that FSK’s stock grew significantly faster than SSSS’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FSKSSSS
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
57%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
55%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
67%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
58%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
69%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
44%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
67%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
57%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
66%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 13 days ago
56%
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
64%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 10 days ago
46%
Bearish Trend 20 days ago
73%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
64%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
33%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
71%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
FSK
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SSSS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
USGDF0.15N/A
+3.40%
American Pacific Mining Corp.
IDCBY14.000.06
+0.43%
Industrial and Commercial Bank of China Ltd.
SCHYY19.88-0.08
-0.40%
Sands China Ltd
VDMCY7.44-0.25
-3.25%
Vodacom Group Ltd.
AUOTY5.58-0.29
-4.94%
AUO CORPORATION

FSK and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FSK has been closely correlated with ARCC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 86% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FSK jumps, then ARCC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FSK
1D Price
Change %
FSK100%
-0.65%
ARCC - FSK
86%
Closely correlated
+0.29%
FDUS - FSK
83%
Closely correlated
+3.04%
SLRC - FSK
83%
Closely correlated
+1.15%
MAIN - FSK
83%
Closely correlated
-0.15%
BCSF - FSK
82%
Closely correlated
-0.46%
More

SSSS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SSSS has been loosely correlated with NXDT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 45% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SSSS jumps, then NXDT could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SSSS
1D Price
Change %
SSSS100%
+1.93%
NXDT - SSSS
45%
Loosely correlated
+0.90%
NEWT - SSSS
43%
Loosely correlated
+1.57%
JHG - SSSS
40%
Loosely correlated
-0.27%
ARES - SSSS
39%
Loosely correlated
-0.54%
CG - SSSS
36%
Loosely correlated
+1.89%
More