Ad is loading...
FSLSX vs MVCAX
FSLSX vs MVCAX Comparison
Open Charts FSLSX vs MVCAX
Fidelity Value Strategies
Price$48.20
Change+$1.06 (+2.25%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.84B
FSLSX vs MVCAX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSLSX vs. MVCAX commentary
Apr 26, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSLSX is a Buy and MVCAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MVCAX has more cash in the bank: 15.8B vs. FSLSX (1.84B). MVCAX pays higher dividends than FSLSX: MVCAX (0.90) vs FSLSX (0.81). FSLSX was incepted earlier than MVCAX: FSLSX (41 years) vs MVCAX (24 years). MVCAX (1.00) is less costly to investors than FSLSX (0.80). FSLSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 61.00 vs. MVCAX (27.00). FSLSX has a lower initial minimum investment than MVCAX: FSLSX (0) vs MVCAX (1000). MVCAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -8.95 vs. FSLSX (-17.28). FSLSX return over 5 years is better than : 79.27 vs. MVCAX (59.24).
| FSLSX | MVCAX | FSLSX / MVCAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.80 | 0.99 | 81% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.80 | 1.00 | 80% |
| Fund Existence | 41 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -13.837 | -8.149 | 170% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.84B | 15.8B | 12% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.81 | 0.90 | 90% |
| Returns for 1 year | -17.28 | -8.95 | 193% |
| Returns for 3 years | -5.63 | -4.00 | 141% |
| Returns for 5 years | 79.27 | 59.24 | 134% |
| Returns for 10 years | 7.18 | 45.33 | 16% |