Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSLZX vs VIMSX
FSLZX vs VIMSX Comparison
Open Charts FSLZX vs VIMSX
Fidelity Advisor Stock Selec Mid Cp Z
Price$48.07
Change-$0.50 (-1.03%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.19B
Vanguard Mid Cap Index Investor
Price$80.20
Change-$0.48 (-0.59%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets201.28B
FSLZX vs VIMSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSLZX vs. VIMSX commentary
Oct 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSLZX is a StrongBuy and VIMSX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VIMSX has more cash in the bank: 201B vs. FSLZX (2.19B). VIMSX pays higher dividends than FSLZX: VIMSX (1.36) vs FSLZX (0.72). FSLZX was incepted earlier than VIMSX: FSLZX (9 years) vs VIMSX (27 years). FSLZX (0.55) is less costly to investors than VIMSX (0.17). FSLZX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 52.00 vs. VIMSX (16.00). FSLZX has a lower initial minimum investment than VIMSX: FSLZX (0) vs VIMSX (3000). VIMSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.10 vs. FSLZX (6.28). VIMSX return over 5 years is better than : 61.47 vs. FSLZX (36.87).
| FSLZX | VIMSX | FSLZX / VIMSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.55 | 0.17 | 324% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.55 | 0.17 | 324% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 27 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.837 | 12.042 | 65% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 3000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.19B | 201B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.72 | 1.36 | 53% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.28 | 13.10 | 48% |
| Returns for 3 years | 36.54 | 54.69 | 67% |
| Returns for 5 years | 36.87 | 61.47 | 60% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 145.68 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement