FSM
Price
$6.37
Change
-$0.27 (-4.07%)
Updated
Jun 27, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
1.13B
HCHDF
Price
$3.53
Change
+$0.11 (+3.22%)
Updated
Jun 26 closing price
Capitalization
510.46M
47 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

FSM vs HCHDF

Header iconFSM vs HCHDF Comparison
Open Charts FSM vs HCHDFBanner chart's image
Fortuna Mining
Price$6.37
Change-$0.27 (-4.07%)
Volume$76.07K
Capitalization1.13B
Hochschild Mining
Price$3.53
Change+$0.11 (+3.22%)
Volume$12.43K
Capitalization510.46M
FSM vs HCHDF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
FSM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
HCHDF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FSM vs. HCHDF commentary
Jun 27, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSM is a StrongBuy and HCHDF is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 27, 2025
Stock price -- (FSM: $6.63 vs. HCHDF: $3.53)
Brand notoriety: FSM and HCHDF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FSM: 84% vs. HCHDF: 59%
Market capitalization -- FSM: $1.13B vs. HCHDF: $510.46M
FSM [@Precious Metals] is valued at $1.13B. HCHDF’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $510.46M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $47.49B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $1.1B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FSM’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileHCHDF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • FSM’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • HCHDF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, HCHDF is a better buy in the long-term than FSM.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FSM’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while HCHDF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FSM’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • HCHDF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, FSM is a better buy in the short-term than HCHDF.

Price Growth

FSM (@Precious Metals) experienced а -1.78% price change this week, while HCHDF (@Precious Metals) price change was +6.33% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was +1.00%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +12.13%, and the average quarterly price growth was +56.64%.

Reported Earning Dates

FSM is expected to report earnings on May 07, 2025.

HCHDF is expected to report earnings on Aug 13, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (+1.00% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSM($1.14B) has a higher market cap than HCHDF($510M). HCHDF has higher P/E ratio than FSM: HCHDF (99.01) vs FSM (26.81). FSM YTD gains are higher at: 54.545 vs. HCHDF (38.037). FSM has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 231M vs. HCHDF (214M). HCHDF has more cash in the bank: 204M vs. FSM (128M). FSM has less debt than HCHDF: FSM (264M) vs HCHDF (314M). FSM has higher revenues than HCHDF: FSM (842M) vs HCHDF (764M).
FSMHCHDFFSM / HCHDF
Capitalization1.14B510M223%
EBITDA231M214M108%
Gain YTD54.54538.037143%
P/E Ratio26.8199.0127%
Revenue842M764M110%
Total Cash128M204M63%
Total Debt264M314M84%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FSM vs HCHDF: Fundamental Ratings
FSM
HCHDF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
8014
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
63
Fair valued
18
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
7864
SMR RATING
1..100
6261
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4148
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
10093
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

HCHDF's Valuation (18) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FSM (63) in the Precious Metals industry. This means that HCHDF’s stock grew somewhat faster than FSM’s over the last 12 months.

HCHDF's Profit vs Risk Rating (64) in the null industry is in the same range as FSM (78) in the Precious Metals industry. This means that HCHDF’s stock grew similarly to FSM’s over the last 12 months.

HCHDF's SMR Rating (61) in the null industry is in the same range as FSM (62) in the Precious Metals industry. This means that HCHDF’s stock grew similarly to FSM’s over the last 12 months.

FSM's Price Growth Rating (41) in the Precious Metals industry is in the same range as HCHDF (48) in the null industry. This means that FSM’s stock grew similarly to HCHDF’s over the last 12 months.

HCHDF's P/E Growth Rating (93) in the null industry is in the same range as FSM (100) in the Precious Metals industry. This means that HCHDF’s stock grew similarly to FSM’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FSMHCHDF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
86%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
88%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
80%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
84%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
78%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
82%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
80%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
80%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
80%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
80%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
80%
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
81%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
87%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
82%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
82%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FSM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
HCHDF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
MBNAX31.220.17
+0.55%
NYLI Balanced Class A
IUSCX11.35N/A
N/A
FI Instl Group U.S. Small Cap Eq
SAGCX35.03N/A
N/A
ClearBridge Growth C
MFWGX17.39N/A
N/A
MFS Global Total Return R1
PAXGX17.26N/A
N/A
Impax Global Opportunities Investor

FSM and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FSM has been closely correlated with AG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 78% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FSM jumps, then AG could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FSM
1D Price
Change %
FSM100%
+2.31%
AG - FSM
78%
Closely correlated
+2.82%
EXK - FSM
76%
Closely correlated
+2.50%
MAG - FSM
73%
Closely correlated
+1.13%
HL - FSM
72%
Closely correlated
+2.92%
PAAS - FSM
72%
Closely correlated
+1.57%
More

HCHDF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, HCHDF has been loosely correlated with HMY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 41% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if HCHDF jumps, then HMY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To HCHDF
1D Price
Change %
HCHDF100%
+3.32%
HMY - HCHDF
41%
Loosely correlated
-0.78%
AU - HCHDF
40%
Loosely correlated
-0.19%
DRD - HCHDF
40%
Loosely correlated
+0.23%
GFI - HCHDF
39%
Loosely correlated
-0.79%
FSM - HCHDF
38%
Loosely correlated
+2.31%
More