FSM
Price
$8.97
Change
+$0.29 (+3.34%)
Updated
Sep 30, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
2.66B
HSTXF
Price
$1.31
Change
+$0.01 (+0.77%)
Updated
Sep 29 closing price
Capitalization
329.41M
Interact to see
Advertisement

FSM vs HSTXF

Header iconFSM vs HSTXF Comparison
Open Charts FSM vs HSTXFBanner chart's image
Fortuna Mining
Price$8.97
Change+$0.29 (+3.34%)
Volume$118.9K
Capitalization2.66B
Heliostar Metals
Price$1.31
Change+$0.01 (+0.77%)
Volume$278.29K
Capitalization329.41M
FSM vs HSTXF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
FSM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
HSTXF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FSM vs. HSTXF commentary
Oct 01, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSM is a Hold and HSTXF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Oct 01, 2025
Stock price -- (FSM: $8.68 vs. HSTXF: $1.31)
Brand notoriety: FSM and HSTXF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FSM: 190% vs. HSTXF: 133%
Market capitalization -- FSM: $2.66B vs. HSTXF: $329.41M
FSM [@Precious Metals] is valued at $2.66B. HSTXF’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $329.41M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $107.78B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $3.23B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FSM’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileHSTXF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • FSM’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • HSTXF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, HSTXF is a better buy in the long-term than FSM.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FSM’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while HSTXF’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FSM’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • HSTXF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, FSM is a better buy in the short-term than HSTXF.

Price Growth

FSM (@Precious Metals) experienced а +2.00% price change this week, while HSTXF (@Precious Metals) price change was -3.82% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was +4.91%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +29.10%, and the average quarterly price growth was +6148.36%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (+4.91% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSM($2.66B) has a higher market cap than HSTXF($329M). FSM has higher P/E ratio than HSTXF: FSM (15.78) vs HSTXF (11.89). HSTXF YTD gains are higher at: 208.113 vs. FSM (102.331). FSM has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 564M vs. HSTXF (40.4M). FSM has more cash in the bank: 394M vs. HSTXF (29.7M). HSTXF has less debt than FSM: HSTXF (4.57M) vs FSM (216M). FSM has higher revenues than HSTXF: FSM (1.19B) vs HSTXF (64.5M).
FSMHSTXFFSM / HSTXF
Capitalization2.66B329M809%
EBITDA564M40.4M1,396%
Gain YTD102.331208.11349%
P/E Ratio15.7811.89133%
Revenue1.19B64.5M1,840%
Total Cash394M29.7M1,327%
Total Debt216M4.57M4,729%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FSM vs HSTXF: Fundamental Ratings
FSM
HSTXF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
2115
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
68
Overvalued
66
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
83100
SMR RATING
1..100
6818
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4036
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
993
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

HSTXF's Valuation (66) in the null industry is in the same range as FSM (68) in the Precious Metals industry. This means that HSTXF’s stock grew similarly to FSM’s over the last 12 months.

FSM's Profit vs Risk Rating (83) in the Precious Metals industry is in the same range as HSTXF (100) in the null industry. This means that FSM’s stock grew similarly to HSTXF’s over the last 12 months.

HSTXF's SMR Rating (18) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FSM (68) in the Precious Metals industry. This means that HSTXF’s stock grew somewhat faster than FSM’s over the last 12 months.

HSTXF's Price Growth Rating (36) in the null industry is in the same range as FSM (40) in the Precious Metals industry. This means that HSTXF’s stock grew similarly to FSM’s over the last 12 months.

HSTXF's P/E Growth Rating (3) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for FSM (99) in the Precious Metals industry. This means that HSTXF’s stock grew significantly faster than FSM’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FSMHSTXF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
86%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
83%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
86%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
83%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
80%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
84%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
84%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
82%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
80%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
85%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 14 days ago
79%
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
87%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
82%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
72%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
84%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FSM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
HSTXF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
PQNCX18.26N/A
N/A
Virtus NFJ Mid-Cap Value C
PIREX28.41N/A
N/A
Principal Real Estate Securities Inst
WAMFX24.03N/A
N/A
Boston Trust Walden Midcap
BRZKX13.39N/A
N/A
BlackRock Sust Aware Adg Intl Eq K
GLPCX30.45N/A
N/A
Goldman Sachs MLP Energy Infras C

HSTXF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, HSTXF has been loosely correlated with PAAS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 36% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if HSTXF jumps, then PAAS could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To HSTXF
1D Price
Change %
HSTXF100%
+0.62%
PAAS - HSTXF
36%
Loosely correlated
+1.17%
CDE - HSTXF
33%
Loosely correlated
+1.57%
NGD - HSTXF
33%
Loosely correlated
+1.61%
RGLD - HSTXF
32%
Poorly correlated
+0.91%
FSM - HSTXF
31%
Poorly correlated
+0.12%
More