FSM
Price
$6.61
Change
-$0.02 (-0.30%)
Updated
Jul 3 closing price
Capitalization
1.13B
MAG
Price
$21.63
Change
+$0.26 (+1.22%)
Updated
Jul 3 closing price
Capitalization
1.12B
37 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

FSM vs MAG

Header iconFSM vs MAG Comparison
Open Charts FSM vs MAGBanner chart's image
Fortuna Mining
Price$6.61
Change-$0.02 (-0.30%)
Volume$8.51M
Capitalization1.13B
MAG Silver
Price$21.63
Change+$0.26 (+1.22%)
Volume$1.09M
Capitalization1.12B
FSM vs MAG Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
FSM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MAG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FSM vs. MAG commentary
Jul 05, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSM is a Hold and MAG is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 05, 2025
Stock price -- (FSM: $6.61 vs. MAG: $21.63)
Brand notoriety: FSM and MAG are both not notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FSM: 51% vs. MAG: 49%
Market capitalization -- FSM: $1.13B vs. MAG: $1.12B
FSM [@Precious Metals] is valued at $1.13B. MAG’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $1.12B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $47.49B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $1.1B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FSM’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileMAG’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • FSM’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • MAG’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, MAG is a better buy in the long-term than FSM.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FSM’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MAG’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FSM’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • MAG’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both FSM and MAG are a good buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

FSM (@Precious Metals) experienced а -0.30% price change this week, while MAG (@Precious Metals) price change was +0.51% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was +2.28%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +7.33%, and the average quarterly price growth was +54.06%.

Reported Earning Dates

FSM is expected to report earnings on May 07, 2025.

MAG is expected to report earnings on Aug 11, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (+2.28% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSM($1.14B) and MAG($1.12B) have the same market capitalization . FSM has higher P/E ratio than MAG: FSM (26.81) vs MAG (22.98). MAG YTD gains are higher at: 62.765 vs. FSM (54.079). FSM has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 231M vs. MAG (-13.89M). FSM has more cash in the bank: 128M vs. MAG (68.7M). MAG has less debt than FSM: MAG (154K) vs FSM (264M). FSM has higher revenues than MAG: FSM (842M) vs MAG (0).
FSMMAGFSM / MAG
Capitalization1.14B1.12B102%
EBITDA231M-13.89M-1,663%
Gain YTD54.07962.76586%
P/E Ratio26.8122.98117%
Revenue842M0-
Total Cash128M68.7M186%
Total Debt264M154K171,429%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FSM vs MAG: Fundamental Ratings
FSM
MAG
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
7884
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
63
Fair valued
78
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
7555
SMR RATING
1..100
6250
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4337
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
10041
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

FSM's Valuation (63) in the Precious Metals industry is in the same range as MAG (78). This means that FSM’s stock grew similarly to MAG’s over the last 12 months.

MAG's Profit vs Risk Rating (55) in the Precious Metals industry is in the same range as FSM (75). This means that MAG’s stock grew similarly to FSM’s over the last 12 months.

MAG's SMR Rating (50) in the Precious Metals industry is in the same range as FSM (62). This means that MAG’s stock grew similarly to FSM’s over the last 12 months.

MAG's Price Growth Rating (37) in the Precious Metals industry is in the same range as FSM (43). This means that MAG’s stock grew similarly to FSM’s over the last 12 months.

MAG's P/E Growth Rating (41) in the Precious Metals industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FSM (100). This means that MAG’s stock grew somewhat faster than FSM’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FSMMAG
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
89%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
89%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
79%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
72%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
77%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
69%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
78%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
80%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
79%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
76%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
80%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
78%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
80%
Bearish Trend 16 days ago
80%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
79%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
85%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
83%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
73%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FSM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MAG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
PHPPX12.870.19
+1.50%
Principal MidCap Growth R5
GTSRX24.000.27
+1.14%
Invesco Small Cap Growth R
FCIGX33.680.37
+1.11%
Fidelity Advisor Small Cap Growth I
SRIAX13.750.08
+0.59%
Gabelli SRI A
VEUCX34.030.05
+0.15%
JPMorgan Europe Dynamic C

FSM and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FSM has been closely correlated with AG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 81% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FSM jumps, then AG could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FSM
1D Price
Change %
FSM100%
-0.30%
AG - FSM
81%
Closely correlated
-0.59%
EXK - FSM
76%
Closely correlated
N/A
PAAS - FSM
75%
Closely correlated
N/A
MAG - FSM
73%
Closely correlated
+1.22%
WPM - FSM
72%
Closely correlated
+0.97%
More

MAG and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MAG has been closely correlated with CDE. These tickers have moved in lockstep 79% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if MAG jumps, then CDE could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MAG
1D Price
Change %
MAG100%
+1.22%
CDE - MAG
79%
Closely correlated
+1.67%
AG - MAG
78%
Closely correlated
-0.59%
HL - MAG
77%
Closely correlated
+0.66%
PAAS - MAG
77%
Closely correlated
N/A
EXK - MAG
76%
Closely correlated
N/A
More