Ad is loading...
FSM
Price
$4.68
Change
-$0.02 (-0.43%)
Updated
Nov 15 closing price
MAG
Price
$14.90
Change
-$0.30 (-1.97%)
Updated
Nov 15 closing price
129 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

FSM vs MAG

Header iconFSM vs MAG Comparison
Open Charts FSM vs MAGBanner chart's image
Fortuna Mining
Price$4.68
Change-$0.02 (-0.43%)
Volume$11.36M
CapitalizationN/A
MAG Silver
Price$14.90
Change-$0.30 (-1.97%)
Volume$1.34M
CapitalizationN/A
FSM vs MAG Comparison Chart
Loading...
FSM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
MAG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FSM vs. MAG commentary
Nov 18, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSM is a StrongSell and MAG is a StrongSell.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 18, 2024
Stock price -- (FSM: $4.68 vs. MAG: $14.90)
Brand notoriety: FSM and MAG are both not notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FSM: 148% vs. MAG: 173%
Market capitalization -- FSM: $1.13B vs. MAG: $1.12B
FSM [@Precious Metals] is valued at $1.13B. MAG’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $1.12B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $47.49B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $1.04B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FSM’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileMAG’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • FSM’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • MAG’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, MAG is a better buy in the long-term than FSM.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FSM’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MAG’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FSM’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 7 bearish.
  • MAG’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, MAG is a better buy in the short-term than FSM.

Price Growth

FSM (@Precious Metals) experienced а -2.09% price change this week, while MAG (@Precious Metals) price change was -7.17% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was -5.50%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -4.71%, and the average quarterly price growth was -2.33%.

Reported Earning Dates

FSM is expected to report earnings on Aug 07, 2024.

MAG is expected to report earnings on Mar 26, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (-5.50% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSM($1.14B) and MAG($1.12B) have the same market capitalization . FSM has higher P/E ratio than MAG: FSM (26.81) vs MAG (22.98). MAG YTD gains are higher at: 43.132 vs. FSM (21.244). FSM has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 231M vs. MAG (-13.89M). FSM has more cash in the bank: 128M vs. MAG (68.7M). MAG has less debt than FSM: MAG (154K) vs FSM (264M). FSM has higher revenues than MAG: FSM (842M) vs MAG (0).
FSMMAGFSM / MAG
Capitalization1.14B1.12B102%
EBITDA231M-13.89M-1,663%
Gain YTD21.24443.13249%
P/E Ratio26.8122.98117%
Revenue842M0-
Total Cash128M68.7M186%
Total Debt264M154K171,429%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FSM vs MAG: Fundamental Ratings
FSM
MAG
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
6673
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
84
Overvalued
94
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
7666
SMR RATING
1..100
8660
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5347
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
6791
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
13n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

FSM's Valuation (84) in the Precious Metals industry is in the same range as MAG (94). This means that FSM’s stock grew similarly to MAG’s over the last 12 months.

MAG's Profit vs Risk Rating (66) in the Precious Metals industry is in the same range as FSM (76). This means that MAG’s stock grew similarly to FSM’s over the last 12 months.

MAG's SMR Rating (60) in the Precious Metals industry is in the same range as FSM (86). This means that MAG’s stock grew similarly to FSM’s over the last 12 months.

MAG's Price Growth Rating (47) in the Precious Metals industry is in the same range as FSM (53). This means that MAG’s stock grew similarly to FSM’s over the last 12 months.

FSM's P/E Growth Rating (67) in the Precious Metals industry is in the same range as MAG (91). This means that FSM’s stock grew similarly to MAG’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FSMMAG
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
86%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
88%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
85%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
83%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
81%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
81%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
71%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
80%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
79%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
77%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
79%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
79%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 20 days ago
80%
Bullish Trend 20 days ago
78%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
80%
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
80%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
80%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
84%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
79%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
FSM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
MAG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
LOGOX37.69-0.12
-0.32%
Scharf Multi-Asset Opportunity Instl
IJEAX11.48-0.08
-0.69%
VY® JPMorgan Emerging Markets Equity A
MIEYX18.45-0.25
-1.34%
MM S&P 500® Index Adm
SFMIX39.97-0.60
-1.48%
American Beacon Stephens Mid-Cap Gr R5
LCCAX37.96-0.58
-1.50%
Columbia Contrarian Core A

FSM and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FSM has been closely correlated with EXK. These tickers have moved in lockstep 76% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FSM jumps, then EXK could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FSM
1D Price
Change %
FSM100%
-0.43%
EXK - FSM
76%
Closely correlated
-1.26%
HL - FSM
76%
Closely correlated
-1.79%
AG - FSM
76%
Closely correlated
-1.63%
MAG - FSM
76%
Closely correlated
-1.97%
PAAS - FSM
76%
Closely correlated
-2.15%
More

MAG and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MAG has been closely correlated with PAAS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 86% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if MAG jumps, then PAAS could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MAG
1D Price
Change %
MAG100%
-1.97%
PAAS - MAG
86%
Closely correlated
-2.15%
HL - MAG
82%
Closely correlated
-1.79%
AG - MAG
82%
Closely correlated
-1.63%
AEM - MAG
80%
Closely correlated
-1.13%
RGLD - MAG
78%
Closely correlated
+0.31%
More