FSM
Price
$10.62
Change
+$0.49 (+4.84%)
Updated
Oct 8, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
3.33B
34 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
PAAS
Price
$45.31
Change
+$0.96 (+2.16%)
Updated
Oct 8 closing price
Capitalization
19B
32 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

FSM vs PAAS

FSM vs PAAS Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FSM vs. PAAS commentary
Oct 09, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSM is a StrongBuy and PAAS is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FSM vs PAAS: Fundamental Ratings
FSM
PAAS
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
6170
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
58
Fair valued
16
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
4552
SMR RATING
1..100
4343
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4260
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
8591
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

PAAS's Valuation (16) in the Precious Metals industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FSM (58). This means that PAAS’s stock grew somewhat faster than FSM’s over the last 12 months.

FSM's Profit vs Risk Rating (45) in the Precious Metals industry is in the same range as PAAS (52). This means that FSM’s stock grew similarly to PAAS’s over the last 12 months.

FSM's SMR Rating (43) in the Precious Metals industry is in the same range as PAAS (43). This means that FSM’s stock grew similarly to PAAS’s over the last 12 months.

FSM's Price Growth Rating (42) in the Precious Metals industry is in the same range as PAAS (60). This means that FSM’s stock grew similarly to PAAS’s over the last 12 months.

FSM's P/E Growth Rating (85) in the Precious Metals industry is in the same range as PAAS (91). This means that FSM’s stock grew similarly to PAAS’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FSMPAAS
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
73%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
76%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
75%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
80%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
70%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 21 days ago
83%
Bullish Trend 21 days ago
82%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
73%
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
71%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
71%
COMPARISON
Comparison
Oct 09, 2026
Stock price -- (FSM: $10.61 vs. PAAS: $45.31)
Brand notoriety: FSM: Not notable vs. PAAS: Notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FSM: 116% vs. PAAS: 70%
Market capitalization -- FSM: $3.33B vs. PAAS: $19B
FSM [@Precious Metals] is valued at $3.33B. PAAS’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $19B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $2.07K to $127.95B. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $12.48B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is overvalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FSM’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green while PAAS’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • FSM’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • PAAS’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, FSM is a better buy in the long-term than PAAS.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FSM’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PAAS’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FSM’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • PAAS’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, FSM is a better buy in the short-term than PAAS.

Price Growth

FSM (@Precious Metals) experienced а -5.01% price change this week, while PAAS (@Precious Metals) price change was +0.73% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was -1.91%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -13.02%, and the average quarterly price growth was -10.24%.

Reported Earning Dates

FSM is expected to report earnings on Nov 11, 2026.

PAAS is expected to report earnings on Nov 10, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (-1.91% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

View a ticker or compare two or three
FSM
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
PAAS
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interact to see
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GBAB12.480.09
+0.73%
Guggenheim Taxable Municipal
PHO68.150.29
+0.43%
Invesco Water Resources ETF (PHO)
AUSM24.83N/A
N/A
Allspring Ultra Short Municipal ETF (AUSM)
SPMV50.75N/A
N/A
Invesco S&P 500 Minimum Variance ETF
GIAX16.16-0.29
-1.76%
Nicholas Global Equity and Income ETF (GIAX)

FSM and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FSM has been closely correlated with PAAS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 89% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FSM jumps, then PAAS could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FSM
1D Price
Change %
FSM100%
+4.84%
PAAS - FSM
89%
Closely correlated
+2.16%
WPM - FSM
88%
Closely correlated
+0.95%
AEM - FSM
87%
Closely correlated
+1.93%
AGI - FSM
86%
Closely correlated
+2.19%
DRD - FSM
85%
Closely correlated
+1.69%
More