FSM
Price
$7.13
Change
-$0.27 (-3.65%)
Updated
Jun 6 closing price
Capitalization
1.13B
WTHVF
Price
$0.12
Change
+$0.02 (+20.00%)
Updated
Jun 6 closing price
Capitalization
25.98M
Interact to see
Advertisement

FSM vs WTHVF

Header iconFSM vs WTHVF Comparison
Open Charts FSM vs WTHVFBanner chart's image
Fortuna Mining
Price$7.13
Change-$0.27 (-3.65%)
Volume$25.62M
Capitalization1.13B
Westhaven Gold
Price$0.12
Change+$0.02 (+20.00%)
Volume$116.05K
Capitalization25.98M
FSM vs WTHVF Comparison Chart
Loading...
FSM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FSM vs. WTHVF commentary
Jun 07, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSM is a Hold and WTHVF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 07, 2025
Stock price -- (FSM: $7.13 vs. WTHVF: $0.12)
Brand notoriety: FSM and WTHVF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FSM: 152% vs. WTHVF: 181%
Market capitalization -- FSM: $1.13B vs. WTHVF: $25.98M
FSM [@Precious Metals] is valued at $1.13B. WTHVF’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $25.98M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $47.49B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $1.09B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FSM’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileWTHVF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • FSM’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • WTHVF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, WTHVF is a better buy in the long-term than FSM.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FSM’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • FSM’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.

Price Growth

FSM (@Precious Metals) experienced а +21.88% price change this week, while WTHVF (@Precious Metals) price change was +21.37% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was +7.34%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +13.68%, and the average quarterly price growth was +46.90%.

Reported Earning Dates

FSM is expected to report earnings on May 07, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (+7.34% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSM($1.14B) has a higher market cap than WTHVF($26M). FSM YTD gains are higher at: 66.200 vs. WTHVF (59.059). FSM has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 231M vs. WTHVF (-1.79M). FSM has more cash in the bank: 128M vs. WTHVF (6.28M). WTHVF has less debt than FSM: WTHVF (275K) vs FSM (264M). FSM has higher revenues than WTHVF: FSM (842M) vs WTHVF (0).
FSMWTHVFFSM / WTHVF
Capitalization1.14B26M4,365%
EBITDA231M-1.79M-12,906%
Gain YTD66.20059.059112%
P/E Ratio26.81N/A-
Revenue842M0-
Total Cash128M6.28M2,040%
Total Debt264M275K96,000%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FSM vs WTHVF: Fundamental Ratings
FSM
WTHVF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
1830
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
64
Fair valued
30
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
61100
SMR RATING
1..100
6291
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3750
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

WTHVF's Valuation (30) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FSM (64) in the Precious Metals industry. This means that WTHVF’s stock grew somewhat faster than FSM’s over the last 12 months.

FSM's Profit vs Risk Rating (61) in the Precious Metals industry is somewhat better than the same rating for WTHVF (100) in the null industry. This means that FSM’s stock grew somewhat faster than WTHVF’s over the last 12 months.

FSM's SMR Rating (62) in the Precious Metals industry is in the same range as WTHVF (91) in the null industry. This means that FSM’s stock grew similarly to WTHVF’s over the last 12 months.

FSM's Price Growth Rating (37) in the Precious Metals industry is in the same range as WTHVF (50) in the null industry. This means that FSM’s stock grew similarly to WTHVF’s over the last 12 months.

FSM's P/E Growth Rating (100) in the Precious Metals industry is in the same range as WTHVF (100) in the null industry. This means that FSM’s stock grew similarly to WTHVF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FSM
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
86%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
84%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
78%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
82%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
82%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
77%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
80%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 25 days ago
80%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
84%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
84%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FSM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GXLM19.311.11
+6.10%
Grayscale Stellar Lumens Trust (XLM)
IYR94.960.39
+0.41%
iShares US Real Estate ETF
NVBW31.690.12
+0.38%
AllianzIM U.S. Large Cp Buffer20 Nov ETF
EWH19.550.07
+0.36%
iShares MSCI Hong Kong ETF
BOCT43.88N/A
N/A
Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF™ Oct

FSM and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FSM has been closely correlated with AG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 78% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FSM jumps, then AG could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FSM
1D Price
Change %
FSM100%
-3.65%
AG - FSM
78%
Closely correlated
-1.66%
EXK - FSM
76%
Closely correlated
-1.32%
PAAS - FSM
72%
Closely correlated
+0.17%
MUX - FSM
70%
Closely correlated
+1.08%
WPM - FSM
70%
Closely correlated
-3.16%
More

WTHVF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that WTHVF and IAUX have been poorly correlated (+32% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that WTHVF and IAUX's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To WTHVF
1D Price
Change %
WTHVF100%
+12.66%
IAUX - WTHVF
32%
Poorly correlated
+0.57%
HMY - WTHVF
30%
Poorly correlated
-5.27%
FSM - WTHVF
29%
Poorly correlated
-3.65%
AGI - WTHVF
29%
Poorly correlated
-1.26%
CHPGF - WTHVF
29%
Poorly correlated
-4.12%
More