Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSMAX vs GGQPX
FSMAX vs GGQPX Comparison
Open Charts FSMAX vs GGQPX
Fidelity Extended Market Index
Price$93.24
Change-$1.96 (-2.06%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets39.63B
Goldman Sachs Mid Cap Growth P
Price$23.16
Change-$0.33 (-1.40%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1B
FSMAX vs GGQPX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMAX vs. GGQPX commentary
Aug 03, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMAX is a Hold and GGQPX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMAX has more cash in the bank: 39.6B vs. GGQPX (1B). FSMAX pays higher dividends than GGQPX: FSMAX (0.46) vs GGQPX (0.00). FSMAX was incepted earlier than GGQPX: FSMAX (14 years) vs GGQPX (7 years). GGQPX (1.00) is less costly to investors than FSMAX (0.04). GGQPX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 63.00 vs. FSMAX (9.00). FSMAX (0) and GGQPX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. GGQPX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 20.21 vs. FSMAX (12.27). FSMAX return over 5 years is better than : 53.82 vs. GGQPX (3.57).
| FSMAX | GGQPX | FSMAX / GGQPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 0.85 | 4% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 1.00 | 4% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 7 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.597 | 10.230 | 25% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 39.6B | 1B | 3,944% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.46 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 12.27 | 20.21 | 61% |
| Returns for 3 years | 39.34 | 31.97 | 123% |
| Returns for 5 years | 53.82 | 3.57 | 1,507% |
| Returns for 10 years | 78.51 | N/A | - |