Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSMAX vs GGQPX
FSMAX vs GGQPX Comparison
Open Charts FSMAX vs GGQPX
Fidelity Extended Market Index
Price$100.57
Change-$0.96 (-0.95%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets41.05B
Goldman Sachs Mid Cap Growth P
Price$23.64
Change+$0.01 (+0.04%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.03B
FSMAX vs GGQPX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMAX vs. GGQPX commentary
Sep 16, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMAX is a Hold and GGQPX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMAX has more cash in the bank: 41B vs. GGQPX (1.03B). FSMAX pays higher dividends than GGQPX: FSMAX (0.44) vs GGQPX (0.00). FSMAX was incepted earlier than GGQPX: FSMAX (14 years) vs GGQPX (7 years). GGQPX (1.00) is less costly to investors than FSMAX (0.04). GGQPX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 63.00 vs. FSMAX (9.00). FSMAX (0) and GGQPX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FSMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 21.46 vs. GGQPX (16.40). FSMAX return over 5 years is better than : 64.88 vs. GGQPX (6.49).
| FSMAX | GGQPX | FSMAX / GGQPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 0.85 | 4% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 1.00 | 4% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 7 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.662 | 10.887 | 98% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 41B | 1.03B | 3,996% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.44 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 21.46 | 16.40 | 131% |
| Returns for 3 years | 53.55 | 34.64 | 155% |
| Returns for 5 years | 64.88 | 6.49 | 1,000% |
| Returns for 10 years | 102.21 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement