Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSMAX vs GSMGX
FSMAX vs GSMGX Comparison
Open Charts FSMAX vs GSMGX
Fidelity Extended Market Index
Price$99.49
Change+$1.11 (+1.13%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets41.05B
Goldman Sachs Small/Mid Cap Growth C
Price$14.50
Change+$0.14 (+0.97%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.45B
FSMAX vs GSMGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMAX vs. GSMGX commentary
Sep 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMAX is a Buy and GSMGX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMAX has more cash in the bank: 41B vs. GSMGX (1.45B). FSMAX pays higher dividends than GSMGX: FSMAX (0.44) vs GSMGX (0.00). FSMAX was incepted earlier than GSMGX: FSMAX (14 years) vs GSMGX (20 years). GSMGX (2.03) is less costly to investors than FSMAX (0.04). GSMGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 69.00 vs. FSMAX (9.00). FSMAX has a lower initial minimum investment than GSMGX: FSMAX (0) vs GSMGX (1000). FSMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 21.50 vs. GSMGX (3.50). FSMAX return over 5 years is better than : 59.13 vs. GSMGX (-18.54).
| FSMAX | GSMGX | FSMAX / GSMGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 1.99 | 2% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 2.03 | 2% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 20 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.057 | -0.480 | -2,093% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 41B | 1.45B | 2,820% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.44 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 21.50 | 3.50 | 615% |
| Returns for 3 years | 56.89 | 23.51 | 242% |
| Returns for 5 years | 59.13 | -18.54 | -319% |
| Returns for 10 years | 101.70 | -23.60 | -431% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement