Ad is loading...
FSMAX vs GSMGX
FSMAX vs GSMGX Comparison
Open Charts FSMAX vs GSMGX
Fidelity Extended Market Index
Price$94.51
Change+$0.64 (+0.68%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets40.78B
Goldman Sachs Small/Mid Cap Growth C
Price$15.18
Change+$0.08 (+0.53%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.8B
FSMAX vs GSMGX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMAX vs. GSMGX commentary
Jan 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMAX is a Hold and GSMGX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMAX has more cash in the bank: 40.8B vs. GSMGX (1.8B). FSMAX pays higher dividends than GSMGX: FSMAX (1.10) vs GSMGX (0.00). FSMAX was incepted earlier than GSMGX: FSMAX (13 years) vs GSMGX (20 years). GSMGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 62.00 vs. FSMAX (18.00). FSMAX has a lower initial minimum investment than GSMGX: FSMAX (0) vs GSMGX (1000). FSMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 26.14 vs. GSMGX (15.62). FSMAX return over 5 years is better than : 48.39 vs. GSMGX (-4.73).
| FSMAX | GSMGX | FSMAX / GSMGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 20 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.994 | 3.638 | 110% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 40.8B | 1.8B | 2,265% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.10 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 26.14 | 15.62 | 167% |
| Returns for 3 years | 21.40 | 8.17 | 262% |
| Returns for 5 years | 48.39 | -4.73 | -1,023% |
| Returns for 10 years | 90.18 | -15.69 | -575% |