Ad is loading...
FSMAX vs GTMTX
FSMAX vs GTMTX Comparison
Open Charts FSMAX vs GTMTX
Fidelity Extended Market Index
Price$79.56
Change+$7.30 (+10.10%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets36.55B
Goldman Sachs Small/Mid Cap Growth I
Price$19.59
Change+$1.92 (+10.87%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.27B
FSMAX vs GTMTX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMAX vs. GTMTX commentary
Apr 11, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMAX is a Buy and GTMTX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMAX has more cash in the bank: 36.5B vs. GTMTX (1.27B). FSMAX pays higher dividends than GTMTX: FSMAX (0.53) vs GTMTX (0.00). FSMAX was incepted earlier than GTMTX: FSMAX (14 years) vs GTMTX (17 years). GTMTX (1.03) is less costly to investors than FSMAX (0.04). GTMTX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 69.00 vs. FSMAX (9.00). FSMAX (0) and GTMTX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FSMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -11.84 vs. GTMTX (-23.54). FSMAX return over 5 years is better than : 52.02 vs. GTMTX (-1.06).
| FSMAX | GTMTX | FSMAX / GTMTX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 0.99 | 4% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 1.03 | 3% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 17 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -20.489 | -23.573 | 87% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 36.5B | 1.27B | 2,874% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.53 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -11.84 | -23.54 | 50% |
| Returns for 3 years | -1.87 | -13.42 | 14% |
| Returns for 5 years | 52.02 | -1.06 | -4,890% |
| Returns for 10 years | 35.24 | -20.01 | -176% |