Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSMAX vs GWGZX
FSMAX vs GWGZX Comparison
Open Charts FSMAX vs GWGZX
Fidelity Extended Market Index
Price$100.73
Change-$0.08 (-0.08%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets41.05B
AMG GW&K Small Mid Cap Core Z
Price$19.66
Change-$0.04 (-0.20%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets752.88M
FSMAX vs GWGZX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMAX vs. GWGZX commentary
Sep 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMAX is a Buy and GWGZX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMAX has more cash in the bank: 41B vs. GWGZX (753M). FSMAX pays higher dividends than GWGZX: FSMAX (0.44) vs GWGZX (0.13). FSMAX was incepted earlier than GWGZX: FSMAX (14 years) vs GWGZX (9 years). GWGZX (0.82) is less costly to investors than FSMAX (0.04). GWGZX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 21.00 vs. FSMAX (9.00). FSMAX has a lower initial minimum investment than GWGZX: FSMAX (0) vs GWGZX (5000000). FSMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 18.16 vs. GWGZX (4.70). FSMAX return over 5 years is better than : 60.51 vs. GWGZX (50.41).
| FSMAX | GWGZX | FSMAX / GWGZX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 0.82 | 4% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 0.82 | 4% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.838 | 3.739 | 290% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 5000000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 41B | 753M | 5,445% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.44 | 0.13 | 346% |
| Returns for 1 year | 18.16 | 4.70 | 387% |
| Returns for 3 years | 57.15 | 27.41 | 209% |
| Returns for 5 years | 60.51 | 50.41 | 120% |
| Returns for 10 years | 103.14 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers