Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSMAX vs IBCGX
FSMAX vs IBCGX Comparison
Open Charts FSMAX vs IBCGX
Fidelity Extended Market Index
Price$98.58
Change+$0.63 (+0.64%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets39.63B
FSMAX vs IBCGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMAX vs. IBCGX commentary
Aug 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMAX is a Hold and IBCGX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMAX has more cash in the bank: 39.6B vs. IBCGX (341M). FSMAX pays higher dividends than IBCGX: FSMAX (0.46) vs IBCGX (0.00). FSMAX was incepted earlier than IBCGX: FSMAX (14 years) vs IBCGX (17 years). IBCGX (1.52) is less costly to investors than FSMAX (0.04). FSMAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 9.00 vs. IBCGX (4.00). FSMAX (0) and IBCGX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FSMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 14.93 vs. IBCGX (-27.43). FSMAX return over 5 years is better than : 52.06 vs. IBCGX (-33.26).
| FSMAX | IBCGX | FSMAX / IBCGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 1.40 | 3% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 1.52 | 2% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 17 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.779 | -28.089 | -28% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 39.6B | 341M | 11,613% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.46 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 14.93 | -27.43 | -54% |
| Returns for 3 years | 45.56 | -23.13 | -197% |
| Returns for 5 years | 52.06 | -33.26 | -157% |
| Returns for 10 years | 96.98 | -45.12 | -215% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers