Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSMAX vs LGOFX
FSMAX vs LGOFX Comparison
Open Charts FSMAX vs LGOFX
Fidelity Extended Market Index
Price$92.17
Change+$1.25 (+1.37%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets37.61B
Lord Abbett Growth Opportunities F
Price$29.52
Change+$0.43 (+1.48%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets612.35M
FSMAX vs LGOFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMAX vs. LGOFX commentary
Jun 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMAX is a StrongBuy and LGOFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMAX has more cash in the bank: 37.6B vs. LGOFX (612M). FSMAX pays higher dividends than LGOFX: FSMAX (0.50) vs LGOFX (0.00). FSMAX was incepted earlier than LGOFX: FSMAX (14 years) vs LGOFX (18 years). LGOFX (1.00) is less costly to investors than FSMAX (0.04). LGOFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 117.00 vs. FSMAX (9.00). FSMAX (0) and LGOFX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. LGOFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 24.80 vs. FSMAX (14.57). FSMAX return over 5 years is better than : 64.38 vs. LGOFX (11.29).
| FSMAX | LGOFX | FSMAX / LGOFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 0.81 | 4% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 1.00 | 4% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 18 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.044 | 6.831 | 1% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 37.6B | 612M | 6,144% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.50 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 14.57 | 24.80 | 59% |
| Returns for 3 years | 43.69 | 46.70 | 94% |
| Returns for 5 years | 64.38 | 11.29 | 570% |
| Returns for 10 years | 73.79 | 27.87 | 265% |