Ad is loading...
FSMAX vs LGOFX
FSMAX vs LGOFX Comparison
Open Charts FSMAX vs LGOFX
Fidelity Extended Market Index
Price$76.01
Change-$3.55 (-4.46%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets36.55B
Lord Abbett Growth Opportunities F
Price$22.63
Change-$0.94 (-3.99%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets493.12M
FSMAX vs LGOFX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMAX vs. LGOFX commentary
Apr 12, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMAX is a Buy and LGOFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMAX has more cash in the bank: 36.5B vs. LGOFX (493M). FSMAX pays higher dividends than LGOFX: FSMAX (0.53) vs LGOFX (0.00). FSMAX was incepted earlier than LGOFX: FSMAX (14 years) vs LGOFX (18 years). LGOFX (1.01) is less costly to investors than FSMAX (0.04). LGOFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 117.00 vs. FSMAX (9.00). FSMAX (0) and LGOFX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. LGOFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 0.30 vs. FSMAX (-1.02). FSMAX return over 5 years is better than : 67.38 vs. LGOFX (7.87).
| FSMAX | LGOFX | FSMAX / LGOFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 0.81 | 4% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 1.01 | 3% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 18 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -12.456 | -13.441 | 93% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 36.5B | 493M | 7,404% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.53 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -1.02 | 0.30 | -343% |
| Returns for 3 years | 8.74 | 3.47 | 252% |
| Returns for 5 years | 67.38 | 7.87 | 856% |
| Returns for 10 years | 49.16 | 2.57 | 1,915% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...