Ad is loading...
FSMAX vs LGOPX
FSMAX vs LGOPX Comparison
Open Charts FSMAX vs LGOPX
Fidelity Extended Market Index
Price$79.56
Change+$7.30 (+10.10%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets36.55B
Lord Abbett Growth Opportunities P
Price$20.73
Change+$2.21 (+11.93%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets440.65M
FSMAX vs LGOPX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMAX vs. LGOPX commentary
Apr 11, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMAX is a Buy and LGOPX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMAX has more cash in the bank: 36.5B vs. LGOPX (441M). FSMAX pays higher dividends than LGOPX: FSMAX (0.53) vs LGOPX (0.00). FSMAX was incepted earlier than LGOPX: FSMAX (14 years) vs LGOPX (25 years). LGOPX (1.36) is less costly to investors than FSMAX (0.04). LGOPX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 117.00 vs. FSMAX (9.00). FSMAX (0) and LGOPX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. LGOPX (-11.73) and FSMAX (-11.84) have marching annual gain over last year. FSMAX return over 5 years is better than : 52.02 vs. LGOPX (-8.27).
| FSMAX | LGOPX | FSMAX / LGOPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 1.16 | 3% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 1.36 | 3% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -20.489 | -22.769 | 90% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 36.5B | 441M | 8,277% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.53 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -11.84 | -11.73 | 101% |
| Returns for 3 years | -1.87 | -9.75 | 19% |
| Returns for 5 years | 52.02 | -8.27 | -629% |
| Returns for 10 years | 35.24 | -16.39 | -215% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...