Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSMAX vs LGOQX
FSMAX vs LGOQX Comparison
Open Charts FSMAX vs LGOQX
Fidelity Extended Market Index
Price$103.15
Change+$0.93 (+0.91%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets41.44B
Lord Abbett Growth Opportunities R2
Price$27.79
Change+$0.46 (+1.68%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets726.54M
FSMAX vs LGOQX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMAX vs. LGOQX commentary
Oct 26, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMAX is a Buy and LGOQX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMAX has more cash in the bank: 41.4B vs. LGOQX (727M). FSMAX pays higher dividends than LGOQX: FSMAX (0.44) vs LGOQX (0.00). FSMAX was incepted earlier than LGOQX: FSMAX (14 years) vs LGOQX (18 years). LGOQX (1.50) is less costly to investors than FSMAX (0.04). LGOQX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 117.00 vs. FSMAX (15.00). FSMAX (0) and LGOQX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. LGOQX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 29.74 vs. FSMAX (17.49). FSMAX return over 5 years is better than : 52.75 vs. LGOQX (-2.53).
| FSMAX | LGOQX | FSMAX / LGOQX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 1.31 | 3% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 1.50 | 2% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 18 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.501 | 21.833 | 62% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 41.4B | 727M | 5,695% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.44 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 17.49 | 29.74 | 59% |
| Returns for 3 years | 63.80 | 69.55 | 92% |
| Returns for 5 years | 52.75 | -2.53 | -2,089% |
| Returns for 10 years | 110.56 | 34.25 | 323% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement