Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSMAX vs LSMNX
FSMAX vs LSMNX Comparison
Open Charts FSMAX vs LSMNX
Fidelity Extended Market Index
Price$94.67
Change-$0.21 (-0.22%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets39.63B
Loomis Sayles Small/Mid Cap Growth N
Price$13.66
Change-$0.02 (-0.15%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets236.73M
FSMAX vs LSMNX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMAX vs. LSMNX commentary
Aug 10, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMAX is a Hold and LSMNX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMAX has more cash in the bank: 39.6B vs. LSMNX (237M). FSMAX pays higher dividends than LSMNX: FSMAX (0.46) vs LSMNX (0.00). FSMAX was incepted earlier than LSMNX: FSMAX (14 years) vs LSMNX (6 years). LSMNX (0.93) is less costly to investors than FSMAX (0.04). LSMNX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 74.00 vs. FSMAX (9.00). FSMAX has a lower initial minimum investment than LSMNX: FSMAX (0) vs LSMNX (1000000). FSMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 18.22 vs. LSMNX (6.89). FSMAX return over 5 years is better than : 50.90 vs. LSMNX (15.08).
| FSMAX | LSMNX | FSMAX / LSMNX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 0.83 | 4% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 0.93 | 4% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.170 | -0.146 | -2,852% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 39.6B | 237M | 16,709% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.46 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 18.22 | 6.89 | 265% |
| Returns for 3 years | 39.44 | 16.75 | 235% |
| Returns for 5 years | 50.90 | 15.08 | 338% |
| Returns for 10 years | 82.73 | N/A | - |