Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSMAX vs NMANX
FSMAX vs NMANX Comparison
Open Charts FSMAX vs NMANX
Fidelity Extended Market Index
Price$95.57
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets39.17B
Neuberger Berman Mid Cap Growth I
Price$18.91
Change+$0.07 (+0.37%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.02B
FSMAX vs NMANX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMAX vs. NMANX commentary
Jul 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMAX is a Hold and NMANX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMAX has more cash in the bank: 39.2B vs. NMANX (2.02B). FSMAX pays higher dividends than NMANX: FSMAX (0.47) vs NMANX (0.00). FSMAX was incepted earlier than NMANX: FSMAX (14 years) vs NMANX (46 years). NMANX (0.85) is less costly to investors than FSMAX (0.04). NMANX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 97.00 vs. FSMAX (9.00). FSMAX has a lower initial minimum investment than NMANX: FSMAX (0) vs NMANX (1000). FSMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.57 vs. NMANX (10.76). FSMAX return over 5 years is better than : 59.70 vs. NMANX (8.65).
| FSMAX | NMANX | FSMAX / NMANX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 0.85 | 4% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 0.85 | 4% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 46 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.161 | 10.628 | 49% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 39.2B | 2.02B | 1,941% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.47 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 12.57 | 10.76 | 117% |
| Returns for 3 years | 54.50 | 38.33 | 142% |
| Returns for 5 years | 59.70 | 8.65 | 690% |
| Returns for 10 years | 80.30 | 20.21 | 397% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement