Ad is loading...
FSMAX vs NMANX
FSMAX vs NMANX Comparison
Open Charts FSMAX vs NMANX
Fidelity Extended Market Index
Price$91.53
Change-$4.22 (-4.41%)
VolumeN/A
CapitalizationN/A
Neuberger Berman Mid Cap Growth I
Price$17.21
Change-$0.83 (-4.60%)
VolumeN/A
CapitalizationN/A
FSMAX vs NMANX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMAX vs. NMANX commentary
Dec 19, 2024
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMAX is a Hold and NMANX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMAX has more cash in the bank: 44.5B vs. NMANX (1.94B). FSMAX pays higher dividends than NMANX: FSMAX (1.10) vs NMANX (0.00). FSMAX was incepted earlier than NMANX: FSMAX (13 years) vs NMANX (46 years). NMANX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 101.00 vs. FSMAX (18.00). FSMAX has a lower initial minimum investment than NMANX: FSMAX (0) vs NMANX (1000). NMANX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 20.51 vs. FSMAX (17.56). FSMAX return over 5 years is better than : 47.17 vs. NMANX (15.49).
| FSMAX | NMANX | FSMAX / NMANX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 46 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 17.256 | 20.588 | 84% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 44.5B | 1.94B | 2,290% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.10 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 17.56 | 20.51 | 86% |
| Returns for 3 years | 10.79 | -2.12 | -510% |
| Returns for 5 years | 47.17 | 15.49 | 304% |
| Returns for 10 years | 80.26 | 30.42 | 264% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...