Ad is loading...
FSMAX vs NMANX
FSMAX vs NMANX Comparison
Open Charts FSMAX vs NMANX
Fidelity Extended Market Index
Price$81.49
Change+$2.00 (+2.52%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets36.55B
Neuberger Berman Mid Cap Growth I
Price$15.45
Change+$0.35 (+2.32%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.63B
FSMAX vs NMANX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMAX vs. NMANX commentary
Apr 25, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMAX is a StrongBuy and NMANX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMAX has more cash in the bank: 36.5B vs. NMANX (1.63B). FSMAX pays higher dividends than NMANX: FSMAX (0.53) vs NMANX (0.00). FSMAX was incepted earlier than NMANX: FSMAX (14 years) vs NMANX (46 years). NMANX (0.85) is less costly to investors than FSMAX (0.04). NMANX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 97.00 vs. FSMAX (9.00). FSMAX has a lower initial minimum investment than NMANX: FSMAX (0) vs NMANX (1000). FSMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -1.02 vs. NMANX (-8.15). FSMAX return over 5 years is better than : 63.03 vs. NMANX (4.79).
| FSMAX | NMANX | FSMAX / NMANX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 0.85 | 4% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 0.85 | 4% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 46 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -14.118 | -11.333 | 125% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 36.5B | 1.63B | 2,245% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.53 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -1.02 | -8.15 | 13% |
| Returns for 3 years | 10.08 | -2.45 | -411% |
| Returns for 5 years | 63.03 | 4.79 | 1,316% |
| Returns for 10 years | 45.70 | -0.32 | -14,325% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers