Ad is loading...
FSMAX vs NMANX
FSMAX vs NMANX Comparison
Open Charts FSMAX vs NMANX
Fidelity Extended Market Index
Price$91.19
Change-$2.88 (-3.06%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets41.92B
Neuberger Berman Mid Cap Growth I
Price$17.34
Change-$0.68 (-3.77%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.89B
FSMAX vs NMANX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMAX vs. NMANX commentary
Feb 23, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMAX is a Hold and NMANX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMAX has more cash in the bank: 41.9B vs. NMANX (1.89B). FSMAX pays higher dividends than NMANX: FSMAX (1.10) vs NMANX (0.00). FSMAX was incepted earlier than NMANX: FSMAX (13 years) vs NMANX (46 years). NMANX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 101.00 vs. FSMAX (18.00). FSMAX has a lower initial minimum investment than NMANX: FSMAX (0) vs NMANX (1000). FSMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 15.39 vs. NMANX (4.08). FSMAX return over 5 years is better than : 41.45 vs. NMANX (4.14).
| FSMAX | NMANX | FSMAX / NMANX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 46 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.341 | 1.820 | 19% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 41.9B | 1.89B | 2,217% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.10 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 15.39 | 4.08 | 377% |
| Returns for 3 years | 24.35 | 7.10 | 343% |
| Returns for 5 years | 41.45 | 4.14 | 1,000% |
| Returns for 10 years | 72.15 | 18.99 | 380% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...