Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSMAX vs NMANX
FSMAX vs NMANX Comparison
Open Charts FSMAX vs NMANX
Fidelity Extended Market Index
Price$90.60
Change+$1.13 (+1.26%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets37.61B
Neuberger Berman Mid Cap Growth I
Price$18.28
Change+$0.24 (+1.33%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.94B
FSMAX vs NMANX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMAX vs. NMANX commentary
Jun 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMAX is a StrongBuy and NMANX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMAX has more cash in the bank: 37.6B vs. NMANX (1.94B). FSMAX pays higher dividends than NMANX: FSMAX (0.50) vs NMANX (0.00). FSMAX was incepted earlier than NMANX: FSMAX (14 years) vs NMANX (46 years). NMANX (0.85) is less costly to investors than FSMAX (0.04). NMANX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 97.00 vs. FSMAX (9.00). FSMAX has a lower initial minimum investment than NMANX: FSMAX (0) vs NMANX (1000). FSMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.97 vs. NMANX (9.07). FSMAX return over 5 years is better than : 51.39 vs. NMANX (7.83).
| FSMAX | NMANX | FSMAX / NMANX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 0.85 | 4% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 0.85 | 4% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 46 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -1.551 | 5.931 | -26% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 37.6B | 1.94B | 1,938% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.50 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.97 | 9.07 | 132% |
| Returns for 3 years | 30.47 | 19.79 | 154% |
| Returns for 5 years | 51.39 | 7.83 | 656% |
| Returns for 10 years | 69.53 | 18.93 | 367% |