Ad is loading...
FSMAX vs NMANX
FSMAX vs NMANX Comparison
Open Charts FSMAX vs NMANX
Fidelity Extended Market Index
Price$86.79
Change-$0.63 (-0.72%)
VolumeN/A
CapitalizationN/A
Neuberger Berman Mid Cap Growth I
Price$17.44
Change+$0.02 (+0.11%)
VolumeN/A
CapitalizationN/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMAX vs NMANX Comparison Chart
Loading...
FSMAX vs. NMANX commentary
Sep 21, 2024
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMAX is a StrongBuy and NMANX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMAX has more cash in the bank: 41.9B vs. NMANX (1.74B). FSMAX pays higher dividends than NMANX: FSMAX (1.10) vs NMANX (0.00). FSMAX was incepted earlier than NMANX: FSMAX (13 years) vs NMANX (46 years). NMANX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 101.00 vs. FSMAX (18.00). FSMAX has a lower initial minimum investment than NMANX: FSMAX (0) vs NMANX (1000). FSMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 28.78 vs. NMANX (20.64). FSMAX return over 5 years is better than : 45.86 vs. NMANX (8.66).
| FSMAX | NMANX | FSMAX / NMANX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 46 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.184 | 14.104 | 79% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 41.9B | 1.74B | 2,409% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.10 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 28.78 | 20.64 | 139% |
| Returns for 3 years | 1.47 | -24.87 | -6% |
| Returns for 5 years | 45.86 | 8.66 | 530% |
| Returns for 10 years | 76.52 | 13.84 | 553% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...