Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSMAX vs NMANX
FSMAX vs NMANX Comparison
Open Charts FSMAX vs NMANX
Fidelity Extended Market Index
Price$94.67
Change-$0.21 (-0.22%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets39.63B
Neuberger Berman Mid Cap Growth I
Price$19.03
Change-$0.20 (-1.04%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.04B
FSMAX vs NMANX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMAX vs. NMANX commentary
Aug 10, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMAX is a Hold and NMANX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMAX has more cash in the bank: 39.6B vs. NMANX (2.04B). FSMAX pays higher dividends than NMANX: FSMAX (0.46) vs NMANX (0.00). FSMAX was incepted earlier than NMANX: FSMAX (14 years) vs NMANX (46 years). NMANX (0.85) is less costly to investors than FSMAX (0.04). NMANX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 97.00 vs. FSMAX (9.00). FSMAX has a lower initial minimum investment than NMANX: FSMAX (0) vs NMANX (1000). FSMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 18.48 vs. NMANX (17.32). FSMAX return over 5 years is better than : 51.23 vs. NMANX (6.37).
| FSMAX | NMANX | FSMAX / NMANX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 0.85 | 4% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 0.85 | 4% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 46 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.401 | 11.744 | 37% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 39.6B | 2.04B | 1,939% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.46 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 18.48 | 17.32 | 107% |
| Returns for 3 years | 39.75 | 26.11 | 152% |
| Returns for 5 years | 51.23 | 6.37 | 804% |
| Returns for 10 years | 83.14 | 23.12 | 360% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers