Ad is loading...
FSMAX vs PFPRX
FSMAX vs PFPRX Comparison
Open Charts FSMAX vs PFPRX
Fidelity Extended Market Index
Price$78.07
Change+$0.12 (+0.15%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets36.55B
Parnassus Mid Cap Growth Institutional
Price$49.46
Change+$0.14 (+0.28%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets689.02M
FSMAX vs PFPRX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMAX vs. PFPRX commentary
Apr 16, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMAX is a Buy and PFPRX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMAX has more cash in the bank: 36.5B vs. PFPRX (689M). FSMAX pays higher dividends than PFPRX: FSMAX (0.53) vs PFPRX (0.00). FSMAX was incepted earlier than PFPRX: FSMAX (14 years) vs PFPRX (10 years). PFPRX (0.71) is less costly to investors than FSMAX (0.04). PFPRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 41.45 vs. FSMAX (9.00). FSMAX has a lower initial minimum investment than PFPRX: FSMAX (0) vs PFPRX (100000). FSMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 0.06 vs. PFPRX (-13.46). FSMAX return over 5 years is better than : 69.01 vs. PFPRX (14.34).
| FSMAX | PFPRX | FSMAX / PFPRX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 0.68 | 5% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 0.71 | 5% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -14.228 | -14.745 | 96% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 100000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 36.5B | 689M | 5,298% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.53 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 0.06 | -13.46 | -0% |
| Returns for 3 years | 5.56 | -3.39 | -164% |
| Returns for 5 years | 69.01 | 14.34 | 481% |
| Returns for 10 years | 47.37 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers