Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSMAX vs PMPCX
FSMAX vs PMPCX Comparison
Open Charts FSMAX vs PMPCX
Fidelity Extended Market Index
Price$102.11
Change-$0.61 (-0.59%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets41.44B
Putnam Sustainable Future C
Price$16.22
Change-$0.41 (-2.47%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets382.16M
FSMAX vs PMPCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMAX vs. PMPCX commentary
Oct 11, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMAX is a Buy and PMPCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMAX has more cash in the bank: 41.4B vs. PMPCX (382M). FSMAX pays higher dividends than PMPCX: FSMAX (0.44) vs PMPCX (0.00). FSMAX was incepted earlier than PMPCX: FSMAX (14 years) vs PMPCX (25 years). PMPCX (1.80) is less costly to investors than FSMAX (0.04). PMPCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 80.00 vs. FSMAX (9.00). FSMAX (0) and PMPCX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FSMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 17.99 vs. PMPCX (-8.88). FSMAX return over 5 years is better than : 51.02 vs. PMPCX (-24.06).
| FSMAX | PMPCX | FSMAX / PMPCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 1.80 | 2% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 1.80 | 2% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.357 | 5.520 | 224% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 41.4B | 382M | 10,838% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.44 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 17.99 | -8.88 | -203% |
| Returns for 3 years | 71.59 | 36.99 | 194% |
| Returns for 5 years | 51.02 | -24.06 | -212% |
| Returns for 10 years | 108.59 | -4.24 | -2,560% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers