Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSMAX vs PMPCX
FSMAX vs PMPCX Comparison
Open Charts FSMAX vs PMPCX
Fidelity Extended Market Index
Price$92.17
Change+$1.25 (+1.37%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets37.61B
Putnam Sustainable Future C
Price$15.81
Change+$0.16 (+1.02%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets374.58M
FSMAX vs PMPCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMAX vs. PMPCX commentary
Jun 28, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMAX is a StrongBuy and PMPCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMAX has more cash in the bank: 37.6B vs. PMPCX (375M). FSMAX pays higher dividends than PMPCX: FSMAX (0.50) vs PMPCX (0.00). FSMAX was incepted earlier than PMPCX: FSMAX (14 years) vs PMPCX (24 years). PMPCX (1.80) is less costly to investors than FSMAX (0.04). PMPCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 43.00 vs. FSMAX (9.00). FSMAX (0) and PMPCX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FSMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 14.57 vs. PMPCX (-11.58). FSMAX return over 5 years is better than : 64.38 vs. PMPCX (-10.47).
| FSMAX | PMPCX | FSMAX / PMPCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 1.80 | 2% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 1.80 | 2% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.044 | -0.698 | -6% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 37.6B | 375M | 10,027% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.50 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 14.57 | -11.58 | -126% |
| Returns for 3 years | 43.69 | 19.65 | 222% |
| Returns for 5 years | 64.38 | -10.47 | -615% |
| Returns for 10 years | 73.79 | -13.73 | -537% |