Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSMAX vs SBMAX
FSMAX vs SBMAX Comparison
Open Charts FSMAX vs SBMAX
FSMAX vs SBMAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMAX vs. SBMAX commentary
Sep 19, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMAX is a Hold and SBMAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMAX has more cash in the bank: 40.1B vs. SBMAX (1.43B). FSMAX pays higher dividends than SBMAX: FSMAX (0.49) vs SBMAX (0.00). FSMAX was incepted earlier than SBMAX: FSMAX (15 years) vs SBMAX (28 years). SBMAX (1.15) is less costly to investors than FSMAX (0.04). SBMAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 29.00 vs. FSMAX (23.00). FSMAX has a lower initial minimum investment than SBMAX: FSMAX (0) vs SBMAX (1000). FSMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.03 vs. SBMAX (-11.67). FSMAX return over 5 years is better than : 32.57 vs. SBMAX (-26.89).
| FSMAX | SBMAX | FSMAX / SBMAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 1.15 | 3% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 1.15 | 3% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 28 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.490 | -0.123 | -10,943% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 40.1B | 1.43B | 2,808% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.49 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 12.03 | -11.67 | -103% |
| Returns for 3 years | 66.71 | 1.45 | 4,605% |
| Returns for 5 years | 32.57 | -26.89 | -121% |
| Returns for 10 years | 131.27 | 10.95 | 1,198% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement