Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSMAX vs SPMCX
FSMAX vs SPMCX Comparison
Open Charts FSMAX vs SPMCX
FSMAX vs SPMCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMAX vs. SPMCX commentary
Aug 29, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMAX is a Hold and SPMCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMAX has more cash in the bank: 40.1B vs. SPMCX (10.7M). FSMAX pays higher dividends than SPMCX: FSMAX (0.50) vs SPMCX (0.00). FSMAX was incepted earlier than SPMCX: FSMAX (15 years) vs SPMCX (24 years). SPMCX (3.10) is less costly to investors than FSMAX (0.04). SPMCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 152.00 vs. FSMAX (23.00). FSMAX has a lower initial minimum investment than SPMCX: FSMAX (0) vs SPMCX (2500). FSMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 19.77 vs. SPMCX (-26.69). FSMAX return over 5 years is better than : 35.45 vs. SPMCX (-41.35).
| FSMAX | SPMCX | FSMAX / SPMCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 3.10 | 1% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 3.10 | 1% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 17.999 | 14.745 | 122% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 40.1B | 10.7M | 374,766% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.50 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 19.77 | -26.69 | -74% |
| Returns for 3 years | 69.63 | -19.50 | -357% |
| Returns for 5 years | 35.45 | -41.35 | -86% |
| Returns for 10 years | 137.27 | -41.13 | -334% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers