Ad is loading...
FSMAX vs TCGCX
FSMAX vs TCGCX Comparison
Open Charts FSMAX vs TCGCX
Fidelity Extended Market Index
Price$77.15
Change+$1.14 (+1.50%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets36.55B
Thornburg Small/Mid Cap Growth C
Price$17.99
Change+$0.24 (+1.35%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets190.61M
FSMAX vs TCGCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMAX vs. TCGCX commentary
Apr 12, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMAX is a Buy and TCGCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMAX has more cash in the bank: 36.5B vs. TCGCX (191M). FSMAX pays higher dividends than TCGCX: FSMAX (0.53) vs TCGCX (0.00). FSMAX was incepted earlier than TCGCX: FSMAX (14 years) vs TCGCX (24 years). TCGCX (3.12) is less costly to investors than FSMAX (0.04). TCGCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 57.56 vs. FSMAX (9.00). FSMAX has a lower initial minimum investment than TCGCX: FSMAX (0) vs TCGCX (5000). FSMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -5.89 vs. TCGCX (-14.05). FSMAX return over 5 years is better than : 59.91 vs. TCGCX (-40.03).
| FSMAX | TCGCX | FSMAX / TCGCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 2.34 | 1% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 3.12 | 1% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -16.362 | -19.037 | 86% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 5000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 36.5B | 191M | 19,110% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.53 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -5.89 | -14.05 | 42% |
| Returns for 3 years | 3.94 | -7.79 | -51% |
| Returns for 5 years | 59.91 | -40.03 | -150% |
| Returns for 10 years | 42.51 | -30.22 | -141% |