Ad is loading...
FSMAX vs TCGCX
FSMAX vs TCGCX Comparison
Open Charts FSMAX vs TCGCX
Fidelity Extended Market Index
Price$85.16
Change+$1.54 (+1.84%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets36.02B
Thornburg Small/Mid Cap Growth C
Price$19.41
Change+$0.29 (+1.52%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets197.56M
FSMAX vs TCGCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMAX vs. TCGCX commentary
May 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMAX is a StrongBuy and TCGCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMAX has more cash in the bank: 36B vs. TCGCX (198M). FSMAX pays higher dividends than TCGCX: FSMAX (0.54) vs TCGCX (0.00). FSMAX was incepted earlier than TCGCX: FSMAX (14 years) vs TCGCX (24 years). TCGCX (3.12) is less costly to investors than FSMAX (0.04). TCGCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.58 vs. FSMAX (9.00). FSMAX has a lower initial minimum investment than TCGCX: FSMAX (0) vs TCGCX (5000). FSMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 3.90 vs. TCGCX (-4.76). FSMAX return over 5 years is better than : 60.52 vs. TCGCX (-42.89).
| FSMAX | TCGCX | FSMAX / TCGCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 2.34 | 1% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 3.12 | 1% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -7.989 | -12.646 | 63% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 5000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 36B | 198M | 18,182% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.54 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.90 | -4.76 | -82% |
| Returns for 3 years | 32.38 | 22.69 | 143% |
| Returns for 5 years | 60.52 | -42.89 | -141% |
| Returns for 10 years | 59.20 | -23.67 | -250% |