Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSMAX vs TQSMX
FSMAX vs TQSMX Comparison
Open Charts FSMAX vs TQSMX
Fidelity Extended Market Index
Price$100.57
Change-$0.96 (-0.95%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets41.05B
T. Rowe Price Integrated US SMCC Eq
Price$24.84
Change-$0.27 (-1.08%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets842.6M
FSMAX vs TQSMX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMAX vs. TQSMX commentary
Sep 16, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMAX is a Hold and TQSMX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMAX has more cash in the bank: 41B vs. TQSMX (843M). TQSMX pays higher dividends than FSMAX: TQSMX (0.52) vs FSMAX (0.44). FSMAX was incepted earlier than TQSMX: FSMAX (14 years) vs TQSMX (10 years). TQSMX (0.90) is less costly to investors than FSMAX (0.04). TQSMX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 52.60 vs. FSMAX (9.00). FSMAX has a lower initial minimum investment than TQSMX: FSMAX (0) vs TQSMX (2500). FSMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 21.46 vs. TQSMX (8.25). TQSMX return over 5 years is better than : 73.28 vs. FSMAX (64.88).
| FSMAX | TQSMX | FSMAX / TQSMX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 0.87 | 4% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 0.90 | 4% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.662 | 9.814 | 109% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 41B | 843M | 4,864% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.44 | 0.52 | 85% |
| Returns for 1 year | 21.46 | 8.25 | 260% |
| Returns for 3 years | 53.55 | 36.50 | 147% |
| Returns for 5 years | 64.88 | 73.28 | 89% |
| Returns for 10 years | 102.21 | N/A | - |