Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSMAX vs TQSMX
FSMAX vs TQSMX Comparison
Open Charts FSMAX vs TQSMX
FSMAX vs TQSMX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMAX vs. TQSMX commentary
Sep 19, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMAX is a Hold and TQSMX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMAX has more cash in the bank: 40.1B vs. TQSMX (2.05B). FSMAX pays higher dividends than TQSMX: FSMAX (0.49) vs TQSMX (0.35). FSMAX was incepted earlier than TQSMX: FSMAX (15 years) vs TQSMX (11 years). TQSMX (0.91) is less costly to investors than FSMAX (0.04). TQSMX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 48.10 vs. FSMAX (23.00). FSMAX has a lower initial minimum investment than TQSMX: FSMAX (0) vs TQSMX (2500). TQSMX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 15.88 vs. FSMAX (12.03). TQSMX return over 5 years is better than : 45.03 vs. FSMAX (32.57).
| FSMAX | TQSMX | FSMAX / TQSMX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 0.88 | 4% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 0.91 | 4% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.490 | 15.226 | 89% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 40.1B | 2.05B | 1,954% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.49 | 0.35 | 141% |
| Returns for 1 year | 12.03 | 15.88 | 76% |
| Returns for 3 years | 66.71 | 53.73 | 124% |
| Returns for 5 years | 32.57 | 45.03 | 72% |
| Returns for 10 years | 131.27 | 162.45 | 81% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement