Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSMAX vs WOOPX
FSMAX vs WOOPX Comparison
Open Charts FSMAX vs WOOPX
FSMAX vs WOOPX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMAX vs. WOOPX commentary
Jun 16, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMAX is a StrongBuy and WOOPX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMAX has more cash in the bank: 42.7B vs. WOOPX (308M). FSMAX pays higher dividends than WOOPX: FSMAX (0.50) vs WOOPX (0.32). FSMAX was incepted earlier than WOOPX: FSMAX (15 years) vs WOOPX (35 years). WOOPX (0.95) is less costly to investors than FSMAX (0.04). WOOPX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 40.00 vs. FSMAX (23.00). FSMAX has a lower initial minimum investment than WOOPX: FSMAX (0) vs WOOPX (1000000). FSMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 30.16 vs. WOOPX (3.83). FSMAX return over 5 years is better than : 35.11 vs. WOOPX (-18.49).
| FSMAX | WOOPX | FSMAX / WOOPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 0.84 | 4% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 0.95 | 4% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 35 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 14.403 | 8.939 | 161% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 42.7B | 308M | 13,864% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.50 | 0.32 | 156% |
| Returns for 1 year | 30.16 | 3.83 | 787% |
| Returns for 3 years | 67.22 | 17.41 | 386% |
| Returns for 5 years | 35.11 | -18.49 | -190% |
| Returns for 10 years | 147.10 | -5.93 | -2,482% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement