Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSMBX vs NAESX
FSMBX vs NAESX Comparison
Open Charts FSMBX vs NAESX
Tributary Small/Mid Cap Instl Plus
Price$16.91
Change+$0.21 (+1.26%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets30.77M
Vanguard Small Cap Index I
Price$124.13
Change+$1.84 (+1.50%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets161.26B
FSMBX vs NAESX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMBX vs. NAESX commentary
Sep 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMBX is a StrongBuy and NAESX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NAESX has more cash in the bank: 161B vs. FSMBX (30.8M). NAESX pays higher dividends than FSMBX: NAESX (1.20) vs FSMBX (0.14). FSMBX was incepted earlier than NAESX: FSMBX (6 years) vs NAESX (65 years). FSMBX (1.34) is less costly to investors than NAESX (0.17). FSMBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. NAESX (13.00). NAESX has a lower initial minimum investment than FSMBX: NAESX (3000) vs FSMBX (5000000). NAESX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.60 vs. FSMBX (-1.33). FSMBX return over 5 years is better than : 71.52 vs. NAESX (67.20).
| FSMBX | NAESX | FSMBX / NAESX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.90 | 0.17 | 529% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.34 | 0.17 | 788% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 65 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -0.646 | 6.364 | -10% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 5000000 | 3000 | 166,667% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 30.8M | 161B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.14 | 1.20 | 11% |
| Returns for 1 year | -1.33 | 9.60 | -14% |
| Returns for 3 years | 23.67 | 37.39 | 63% |
| Returns for 5 years | 71.52 | 67.20 | 106% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 132.16 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement