Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSMBX vs NAESX
FSMBX vs NAESX Comparison
Open Charts FSMBX vs NAESX
Tributary Small/Mid Cap Instl Plus
Price$16.55
Change+$0.17 (+1.04%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets29.9M
Vanguard Small Cap Index I
Price$122.55
Change-$1.06 (-0.86%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets162.36B
FSMBX vs NAESX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMBX vs. NAESX commentary
Oct 10, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMBX is a Buy and NAESX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NAESX has more cash in the bank: 162B vs. FSMBX (29.9M). NAESX pays higher dividends than FSMBX: NAESX (1.23) vs FSMBX (0.14). FSMBX was incepted earlier than NAESX: FSMBX (6 years) vs NAESX (65 years). FSMBX (1.34) is less costly to investors than NAESX (0.17). FSMBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. NAESX (13.00). NAESX has a lower initial minimum investment than FSMBX: NAESX (3000) vs FSMBX (5000000). NAESX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.54 vs. FSMBX (-4.32). FSMBX (58.00) and NAESX (57.94) have equivalent 5 years return.
| FSMBX | NAESX | FSMBX / NAESX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.90 | 0.17 | 529% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.34 | 0.17 | 788% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 65 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -2.761 | 7.579 | -36% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 5000000 | 3000 | 166,667% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 29.9M | 162B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.14 | 1.23 | 12% |
| Returns for 1 year | -4.32 | 9.54 | -45% |
| Returns for 3 years | 26.46 | 49.41 | 54% |
| Returns for 5 years | 58.00 | 57.94 | 100% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 133.88 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement