Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSMD vs SCHA
FSMD vs SCHA Comparison
Open Charts FSMD vs SCHA
Fidelity Small-Mid Multifactor ETF
Price$42.45
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$3.71K
Net Assets1.78B
Schwab US Small-Cap ETF™
Price$26.94
Change-$0.02 (-0.07%)
Volume$19.28K
Net Assets18.15B
FSMD vs SCHA Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMD vs. SCHA commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMD is a Hold and SCHA is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SCHA has more net assets: 18.2B vs. FSMD (1.79B). SCHA has a higher annual dividend yield than FSMD: SCHA (5.091) vs FSMD (4.238). FSMD was incepted earlier than SCHA: FSMD (7 years) vs SCHA (16 years). SCHA (0.04) has a lower expense ratio than FSMD (0.16). FSMD has a higher turnover SCHA (11.00) vs SCHA (11.00).
| FSMD | SCHA | FSMD / SCHA | |
| Gain YTD | 4.238 | 5.091 | 83% |
| Net Assets | 1.79B | 18.2B | 10% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.16 | 0.04 | 400% |
| Turnover | 38.00 | 11.00 | 345% |
| Yield | 1.38 | 1.41 | 98% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 16 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| FSMD | SCHA | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 85% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 75% | 2 days ago 83% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 88% | 2 days ago 83% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 78% | 2 days ago 84% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 80% | 2 days ago 83% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 8 days ago 85% | 9 days ago 86% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 80% | 7 days ago 83% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 88% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 79% | N/A |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
FSMD and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FSMD has been closely correlated with BLD. These tickers have moved in lockstep 71% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FSMD jumps, then BLD could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FSMD | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FSMD | 100% | -0.02% | ||
| BLD - FSMD | 71% Closely correlated | +0.24% | ||
| EME - FSMD | 48% Loosely correlated | -1.42% | ||
| EXAS - FSMD | 45% Loosely correlated | +23.68% | ||
| XPO - FSMD | 39% Loosely correlated | -1.64% | ||
| DKS - FSMD | 34% Loosely correlated | -1.49% | ||
More | ||||
SCHA and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SCHA has been loosely correlated with THC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 55% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SCHA jumps, then THC could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SCHA | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SCHA | 100% | -0.07% | ||
| THC - SCHA | 55% Loosely correlated | +0.65% | ||
| FIX - SCHA | 46% Loosely correlated | +1.03% | ||
| CNM - SCHA | 45% Loosely correlated | -0.70% | ||
| NTRA - SCHA | 40% Loosely correlated | +2.20% | ||
| TXRH - SCHA | 33% Poorly correlated | -2.22% | ||
More | ||||