Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSMDX vs LMOPX
FSMDX vs LMOPX Comparison
Open Charts FSMDX vs LMOPX
FSMDX vs LMOPX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMDX vs. LMOPX commentary
Jul 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMDX is a Hold and LMOPX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMDX has more cash in the bank: 53.2B vs. LMOPX (2.04B). FSMDX pays higher dividends than LMOPX: FSMDX (0.76) vs LMOPX (0.00). FSMDX was incepted earlier than LMOPX: FSMDX (15 years) vs LMOPX (27 years). LMOPX (2.44) is less costly to investors than FSMDX (0.03). LMOPX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 27.00 vs. FSMDX (15.00). FSMDX has a lower initial minimum investment than LMOPX: FSMDX (0) vs LMOPX (1000). LMOPX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 28.85 vs. FSMDX (19.67). FSMDX return over 5 years is better than : 45.89 vs. LMOPX (12.50).
| FSMDX | LMOPX | FSMDX / LMOPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 2.44 | 1% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 2.44 | 1% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 27 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 14.947 | 11.314 | 132% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 53.2B | 2.04B | 2,612% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.76 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 19.67 | 28.85 | 68% |
| Returns for 3 years | 52.50 | 86.43 | 61% |
| Returns for 5 years | 45.89 | 12.50 | 367% |
| Returns for 10 years | 165.79 | 204.23 | 81% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers