Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSMDX vs LVOAX
FSMDX vs LVOAX Comparison
Open Charts FSMDX vs LVOAX
Fidelity Mid Cap Index
Price$36.42
Change-$0.16 (-0.44%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets42.38B
Lord Abbett Value Opportunities A
Price$18.72
Change-$0.04 (-0.21%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.14B
FSMDX vs LVOAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMDX vs. LVOAX commentary
Jul 30, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMDX is a Buy and LVOAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMDX has more cash in the bank: 42.4B vs. LVOAX (1.14B). FSMDX pays higher dividends than LVOAX: FSMDX (1.31) vs LVOAX (0.00). FSMDX was incepted earlier than LVOAX: FSMDX (14 years) vs LVOAX (20 years). LVOAX (1.19) is less costly to investors than FSMDX (0.03). LVOAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 33.00 vs. FSMDX (15.00). FSMDX has a lower initial minimum investment than LVOAX: FSMDX (0) vs LVOAX (1500). FSMDX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.68 vs. LVOAX (-4.96). FSMDX return over 5 years is better than : 72.00 vs. LVOAX (11.21).
| FSMDX | LVOAX | FSMDX / LVOAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 1.19 | 2% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 1.19 | 2% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 20 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.584 | -0.741 | -1,159% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 42.4B | 1.14B | 3,716% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.31 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 13.68 | -4.96 | -276% |
| Returns for 3 years | 39.33 | 4.47 | 880% |
| Returns for 5 years | 72.00 | 11.21 | 642% |
| Returns for 10 years | 125.76 | -7.42 | -1,695% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement