Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSMDX vs PQCCX
FSMDX vs PQCCX Comparison
Open Charts FSMDX vs PQCCX
Fidelity Mid Cap Index
Price$36.90
Change+$0.34 (+0.93%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets44.83B
PGIM Quant Solutions Mid-Cap Index R6
Price$10.06
Change+$0.15 (+1.51%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets13.45M
FSMDX vs PQCCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMDX vs. PQCCX commentary
Sep 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMDX is a Buy and PQCCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMDX has more cash in the bank: 44.8B vs. PQCCX (13.5M). FSMDX (1.26) and PQCCX (1.21) have matching dividends . FSMDX was incepted earlier than PQCCX: FSMDX (14 years) vs PQCCX (9 years). PQCCX (1.71) is less costly to investors than FSMDX (0.03). PQCCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 169.00 vs. FSMDX (15.00). FSMDX (0) and PQCCX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FSMDX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 14.47 vs. PQCCX (-5.39). FSMDX return over 5 years is better than : 71.01 vs. PQCCX (6.38).
| FSMDX | PQCCX | FSMDX / PQCCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 0.20 | 13% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 1.71 | 1% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.771 | 5.783 | 169% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 44.8B | 13.5M | 331,852% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.26 | 1.21 | 104% |
| Returns for 1 year | 14.47 | -5.39 | -268% |
| Returns for 3 years | 47.43 | 1.92 | 2,464% |
| Returns for 5 years | 71.01 | 6.38 | 1,113% |
| Returns for 10 years | 140.48 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers