Ad is loading...
FSMDX vs STSAX
FSMDX vs STSAX Comparison
Open Charts FSMDX vs STSAX
Fidelity Mid Cap Index
Price$33.15
Change+$0.41 (+1.25%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets37.64B
Allspring Common Stock C
Price$6.63
Change+$0.08 (+1.22%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets650.76M
FSMDX vs STSAX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMDX vs. STSAX commentary
Apr 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMDX is a Buy and STSAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMDX has more cash in the bank: 37.6B vs. STSAX (651M). FSMDX pays higher dividends than STSAX: FSMDX (1.20) vs STSAX (0.00). FSMDX was incepted earlier than STSAX: FSMDX (14 years) vs STSAX (24 years). STSAX (2.02) is less costly to investors than FSMDX (0.03). STSAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 46.00 vs. FSMDX (8.00). FSMDX has a lower initial minimum investment than STSAX: FSMDX (0) vs STSAX (1000). FSMDX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 3.64 vs. STSAX (-18.94). FSMDX return over 5 years is better than : 116.15 vs. STSAX (-17.82).
| FSMDX | STSAX | FSMDX / STSAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 2.01 | 1% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 2.02 | 1% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -3.050 | -8.647 | 35% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 37.6B | 651M | 5,776% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.20 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.64 | -18.94 | -19% |
| Returns for 3 years | 12.50 | -41.93 | -30% |
| Returns for 5 years | 116.15 | -17.82 | -652% |
| Returns for 10 years | 98.36 | -66.58 | -148% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers