Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSMDX vs WOOPX
FSMDX vs WOOPX Comparison
Open Charts FSMDX vs WOOPX
Fidelity Mid Cap Index
Price$35.56
Change+$0.25 (+0.71%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets42.38B
JPMorgan SMID Cap Equity I
Price$18.35
Change+$0.25 (+1.38%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets334.63M
FSMDX vs WOOPX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMDX vs. WOOPX commentary
Jul 02, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMDX is a Buy and WOOPX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMDX has more cash in the bank: 42.4B vs. WOOPX (335M). FSMDX pays higher dividends than WOOPX: FSMDX (1.31) vs WOOPX (0.36). FSMDX was incepted earlier than WOOPX: FSMDX (14 years) vs WOOPX (34 years). WOOPX (0.96) is less costly to investors than FSMDX (0.03). WOOPX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 39.00 vs. FSMDX (8.00). FSMDX has a lower initial minimum investment than WOOPX: FSMDX (0) vs WOOPX (1000000). FSMDX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 14.87 vs. WOOPX (6.59). FSMDX return over 5 years is better than : 75.38 vs. WOOPX (10.59).
| FSMDX | WOOPX | FSMDX / WOOPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 0.84 | 3% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 0.96 | 3% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 34 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.814 | -1.683 | -286% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 42.4B | 335M | 12,657% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.31 | 0.36 | 369% |
| Returns for 1 year | 14.87 | 6.59 | 226% |
| Returns for 3 years | 45.68 | 9.76 | 468% |
| Returns for 5 years | 75.38 | 10.59 | 712% |
| Returns for 10 years | 118.41 | -17.64 | -671% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement