Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSMDX vs WOOPX
FSMDX vs WOOPX Comparison
Open Charts FSMDX vs WOOPX
Fidelity Mid Cap Index
Price$37.13
Change-$0.31 (-0.83%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets44.83B
JPMorgan SMID Cap Equity I
Price$18.41
Change-$0.11 (-0.59%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets331.99M
FSMDX vs WOOPX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMDX vs. WOOPX commentary
Sep 16, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMDX is a Buy and WOOPX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMDX has more cash in the bank: 44.8B vs. WOOPX (332M). FSMDX pays higher dividends than WOOPX: FSMDX (1.26) vs WOOPX (0.34). FSMDX was incepted earlier than WOOPX: FSMDX (14 years) vs WOOPX (34 years). WOOPX (0.96) is less costly to investors than FSMDX (0.03). WOOPX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 39.00 vs. FSMDX (15.00). FSMDX has a lower initial minimum investment than WOOPX: FSMDX (0) vs WOOPX (1000000). FSMDX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 14.20 vs. WOOPX (0.68). FSMDX return over 5 years is better than : 75.20 vs. WOOPX (3.80).
| FSMDX | WOOPX | FSMDX / WOOPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 0.84 | 3% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 0.96 | 3% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 34 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.216 | 0.543 | 1,882% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 44.8B | 332M | 13,494% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.26 | 0.34 | 365% |
| Returns for 1 year | 14.20 | 0.68 | 2,100% |
| Returns for 3 years | 45.03 | 10.78 | 418% |
| Returns for 5 years | 75.20 | 3.80 | 1,979% |
| Returns for 10 years | 141.17 | -10.33 | -1,366% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement