Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSMDX vs WOOPX
FSMDX vs WOOPX Comparison
Open Charts FSMDX vs WOOPX
FSMDX vs WOOPX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMDX vs. WOOPX commentary
Sep 20, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMDX is a Hold and WOOPX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMDX has more cash in the bank: 53.1B vs. WOOPX (220M). FSMDX pays higher dividends than WOOPX: FSMDX (0.75) vs WOOPX (0.32). FSMDX was incepted earlier than WOOPX: FSMDX (15 years) vs WOOPX (35 years). WOOPX (0.95) is less costly to investors than FSMDX (0.03). WOOPX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 60.00 vs. FSMDX (15.00). FSMDX has a lower initial minimum investment than WOOPX: FSMDX (0) vs WOOPX (1000000). FSMDX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.86 vs. WOOPX (-6.14). FSMDX return over 5 years is better than : 40.93 vs. WOOPX (-24.44).
| FSMDX | WOOPX | FSMDX / WOOPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 0.84 | 3% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 0.95 | 3% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 35 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.945 | 3.159 | 442% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 53.1B | 220M | 24,136% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.75 | 0.32 | 232% |
| Returns for 1 year | 13.86 | -6.14 | -226% |
| Returns for 3 years | 57.80 | 11.32 | 511% |
| Returns for 5 years | 40.93 | -24.44 | -167% |
| Returns for 10 years | 165.73 | -14.08 | -1,177% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers