Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSMDX vs WOOPX
FSMDX vs WOOPX Comparison
Open Charts FSMDX vs WOOPX
JPMorgan SMID Cap Equity I
Price$17.88
Change-$0.01 (-0.06%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets363.59M
FSMDX vs WOOPX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMDX vs. WOOPX commentary
Jun 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMDX is a Buy and WOOPX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMDX has more cash in the bank: 40.4B vs. WOOPX (364M). FSMDX pays higher dividends than WOOPX: FSMDX (1.14) vs WOOPX (0.36). FSMDX was incepted earlier than WOOPX: FSMDX (14 years) vs WOOPX (34 years). WOOPX (0.96) is less costly to investors than FSMDX (0.03). WOOPX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 39.00 vs. FSMDX (8.00). FSMDX has a lower initial minimum investment than WOOPX: FSMDX (0) vs WOOPX (1000000). FSMDX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.44 vs. WOOPX (5.48). FSMDX return over 5 years is better than : 62.65 vs. WOOPX (1.27).
| FSMDX | WOOPX | FSMDX / WOOPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 0.84 | 3% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 0.96 | 3% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 34 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.599 | -2.877 | -56% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 40.4B | 364M | 11,099% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.14 | 0.36 | 315% |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.44 | 5.48 | 190% |
| Returns for 3 years | 26.25 | 1.59 | 1,654% |
| Returns for 5 years | 62.65 | 1.27 | 4,918% |
| Returns for 10 years | 110.76 | -19.68 | -563% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement