Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSMUX vs LTNIX
FSMUX vs LTNIX Comparison
Open Charts FSMUX vs LTNIX
Strategic Advisers Municipal Bond
Price$8.57
Change+$0.03 (+0.35%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets12.37B
Lord Abbett National Tax Free I
Price$10.00
Change+$0.04 (+0.40%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets4.49B
FSMUX vs LTNIX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMUX has more cash in the bank: 12.4B vs. LTNIX (4.49B). LTNIX (4.10) and FSMUX (3.98) have matching dividends . FSMUX was incepted earlier than LTNIX: FSMUX (4 years) vs LTNIX (15 years). LTNIX (0.58) is less costly to investors than FSMUX (0.44). FSMUX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 48.00 vs. LTNIX (27.00). FSMUX has a lower initial minimum investment than LTNIX: FSMUX (0) vs LTNIX (1000000). FSMUX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -0.46 vs. LTNIX (-1.48).
| FSMUX | LTNIX | FSMUX / LTNIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.19 | 0.58 | 33% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.44 | 0.58 | 76% |
| Fund Existence | 4 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -1.029 | -2.098 | 49% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 12.4B | 4.49B | 276% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.98 | 4.10 | 97% |
| Returns for 1 year | -0.46 | -1.48 | 31% |
| Returns for 3 years | 5.62 | 4.48 | 126% |
| Returns for 5 years | N/A | -0.83 | - |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 12.71 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers