Ad is loading...
FSMUX vs MTFCX
FSMUX vs MTFCX Comparison
Open Charts FSMUX vs MTFCX
Strategic Advisers Municipal Bond
Price$8.57
Change+$0.03 (+0.35%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets11.66B
NYLI MacKay Tax Free Bond
Price$9.03
Change+$0.04 (+0.44%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets8.85B
FSMUX vs MTFCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMUX has more cash in the bank: 11.7B vs. MTFCX (8.85B). FSMUX pays higher dividends than MTFCX: FSMUX (3.76) vs MTFCX (3.34). FSMUX was incepted earlier than MTFCX: FSMUX (4 years) vs MTFCX (27 years). MTFCX (1.03) is less costly to investors than FSMUX (0.44). FSMUX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 48.00 vs. MTFCX (36.00). FSMUX has a lower initial minimum investment than MTFCX: FSMUX (0) vs MTFCX (1000). FSMUX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 0.90 vs. MTFCX (0.34).
| FSMUX | MTFCX | FSMUX / MTFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.19 | 1.03 | 18% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.44 | 1.03 | 43% |
| Fund Existence | 4 years | 27 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -2.695 | -2.223 | 121% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 11.7B | 8.85B | 132% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.76 | 3.34 | 113% |
| Returns for 1 year | 0.90 | 0.34 | 266% |
| Returns for 3 years | 5.97 | 3.95 | 151% |
| Returns for 5 years | N/A | 1.52 | - |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 16.24 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers