Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSMUX vs MTFCX
FSMUX vs MTFCX Comparison
Open Charts FSMUX vs MTFCX
Strategic Advisers Municipal Bond
Price$8.57
Change+$0.02 (+0.23%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets11.99B
NYLI MacKay Tax Free Bond
Price$9.03
Change+$0.02 (+0.22%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets8.73B
FSMUX vs MTFCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMUX has more cash in the bank: 12B vs. MTFCX (8.73B). FSMUX pays higher dividends than MTFCX: FSMUX (3.94) vs MTFCX (3.38). FSMUX was incepted earlier than MTFCX: FSMUX (4 years) vs MTFCX (27 years). MTFCX (1.03) is less costly to investors than FSMUX (0.44). FSMUX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 48.00 vs. MTFCX (36.00). FSMUX has a lower initial minimum investment than MTFCX: FSMUX (0) vs MTFCX (1000). FSMUX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 1.06 vs. MTFCX (0.56).
| FSMUX | MTFCX | FSMUX / MTFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.19 | 1.03 | 18% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.44 | 1.03 | 43% |
| Fund Existence | 4 years | 27 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -1.920 | -1.663 | 115% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 12B | 8.73B | 137% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.94 | 3.38 | 116% |
| Returns for 1 year | 1.06 | 0.56 | 189% |
| Returns for 3 years | 5.54 | 2.91 | 190% |
| Returns for 5 years | N/A | -0.86 | - |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 18.17 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers