Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSMUX vs RTCEX
FSMUX vs RTCEX Comparison
Open Charts FSMUX vs RTCEX
Strategic Advisers Municipal Bond
Price$8.58
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets12.37B
Columbia Strategic Municipal Inc C
Price$13.98
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.63B
FSMUX vs RTCEX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMUX has more cash in the bank: 12.4B vs. RTCEX (1.63B). FSMUX pays higher dividends than RTCEX: FSMUX (3.98) vs RTCEX (3.14). FSMUX was incepted earlier than RTCEX: FSMUX (4 years) vs RTCEX (25 years). RTCEX (1.57) is less costly to investors than FSMUX (0.44). FSMUX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 48.00 vs. RTCEX (33.00). FSMUX has a lower initial minimum investment than RTCEX: FSMUX (0) vs RTCEX (2000). FSMUX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -0.35 vs. RTCEX (-3.38).
| FSMUX | RTCEX | FSMUX / RTCEX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.19 | 1.50 | 13% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.44 | 1.57 | 28% |
| Fund Existence | 4 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -0.913 | -3.313 | 28% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 12.4B | 1.63B | 760% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.98 | 3.14 | 127% |
| Returns for 1 year | -0.35 | -3.38 | 10% |
| Returns for 3 years | 6.33 | 1.39 | 455% |
| Returns for 5 years | N/A | -6.56 | - |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 9.62 | - |