Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSMUX vs RTCEX
FSMUX vs RTCEX Comparison
Open Charts FSMUX vs RTCEX
Strategic Advisers Municipal Bond
Price$8.88
Change+$0.01 (+0.11%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets13.01B
Columbia Strategic Municipal Inc C
Price$14.65
Change+$0.01 (+0.07%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.63B
FSMUX vs RTCEX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMUX has more cash in the bank: 13B vs. RTCEX (1.63B). FSMUX pays higher dividends than RTCEX: FSMUX (3.90) vs RTCEX (3.02). FSMUX was incepted earlier than RTCEX: FSMUX (4 years) vs RTCEX (25 years). RTCEX (1.57) is less costly to investors than FSMUX (0.44). RTCEX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 33.00 vs. FSMUX (26.00). FSMUX has a lower initial minimum investment than RTCEX: FSMUX (0) vs RTCEX (2000). FSMUX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 2.62 vs. RTCEX (0.40).
| FSMUX | RTCEX | FSMUX / RTCEX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.19 | 1.50 | 13% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.44 | 1.57 | 28% |
| Fund Existence | 4 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.127 | 1.771 | 177% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 13B | 1.63B | 797% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.90 | 3.02 | 129% |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.62 | 0.40 | 647% |
| Returns for 3 years | 19.20 | 18.63 | 103% |
| Returns for 5 years | N/A | 0.29 | - |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 14.18 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement