Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSMUX vs RTCEX
FSMUX vs RTCEX Comparison
Open Charts FSMUX vs RTCEX
Strategic Advisers Municipal Bond
Price$8.61
Change+$0.02 (+0.23%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets12.56B
Columbia Strategic Municipal Inc C
Price$14.17
Change+$0.13 (+0.93%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.64B
FSMUX vs RTCEX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMUX has more cash in the bank: 12.6B vs. RTCEX (1.64B). FSMUX pays higher dividends than RTCEX: FSMUX (3.98) vs RTCEX (3.13). FSMUX was incepted earlier than RTCEX: FSMUX (4 years) vs RTCEX (25 years). RTCEX (1.57) is less costly to investors than FSMUX (0.44). FSMUX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 35.00 vs. RTCEX (33.00). FSMUX has a lower initial minimum investment than RTCEX: FSMUX (0) vs RTCEX (2000). FSMUX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 0.16 vs. RTCEX (-2.56).
| FSMUX | RTCEX | FSMUX / RTCEX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.19 | 1.50 | 13% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.44 | 1.57 | 28% |
| Fund Existence | 4 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.357 | -1.740 | -21% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 12.6B | 1.64B | 769% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.98 | 3.13 | 127% |
| Returns for 1 year | 0.16 | -2.56 | -6% |
| Returns for 3 years | 11.11 | 7.73 | 144% |
| Returns for 5 years | N/A | -3.80 | - |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 11.37 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement