Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSMUX vs TFILX
FSMUX vs TFILX Comparison
Open Charts FSMUX vs TFILX
Strategic Advisers Municipal Bond
Price$8.86
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets13.23B
T. Rowe Price Tax Free Income I
Price$9.41
Change+$0.01 (+0.11%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.31B
FSMUX vs TFILX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMUX has more cash in the bank: 13.2B vs. TFILX (2.31B). FSMUX (3.87) and TFILX (3.72) have matching dividends . FSMUX was incepted earlier than TFILX: FSMUX (4 years) vs TFILX (8 years). FSMUX (0.44) is less costly to investors than TFILX (0.35). FSMUX (26.00) and TFILX (25.80) have comparable annual turnover. FSMUX has a lower initial minimum investment than TFILX: FSMUX (0) vs TFILX (500000). FSMUX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 2.74 vs. TFILX (2.56).
| FSMUX | TFILX | FSMUX / TFILX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.19 | 0.35 | 54% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.44 | 0.35 | 126% |
| Fund Existence | 4 years | 8 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.355 | 3.234 | 104% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 500000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 13.2B | 2.31B | 570% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.87 | 3.72 | 104% |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.74 | 2.56 | 107% |
| Returns for 3 years | 14.84 | 14.42 | 103% |
| Returns for 5 years | N/A | 5.99 | - |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement