Ad is loading...
FSMUX vs TFILX
FSMUX vs TFILX Comparison
Open Charts FSMUX vs TFILX
Strategic Advisers Municipal Bond
Price$8.86
Change-$0.01 (-0.11%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets11.92B
T. Rowe Price Tax Free Income I
Price$9.39
Change-$0.01 (-0.11%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.36B
FSMUX vs TFILX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMUX has more cash in the bank: 11.9B vs. TFILX (2.36B). FSMUX pays higher dividends than TFILX: FSMUX (3.75) vs TFILX (3.47). FSMUX was incepted earlier than TFILX: FSMUX (4 years) vs TFILX (8 years). FSMUX (0.44) is less costly to investors than TFILX (0.35). FSMUX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 48.00 vs. TFILX (25.00). FSMUX has a lower initial minimum investment than TFILX: FSMUX (0) vs TFILX (500000). FSMUX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 3.14 vs. TFILX (2.67).
| FSMUX | TFILX | FSMUX / TFILX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.19 | 0.35 | 54% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.44 | 0.35 | 126% |
| Fund Existence | 4 years | 8 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.732 | 0.383 | 191% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 500000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 11.9B | 2.36B | 504% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.75 | 3.47 | 108% |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.14 | 2.67 | 117% |
| Returns for 3 years | 4.55 | 4.14 | 110% |
| Returns for 5 years | N/A | 6.35 | - |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...