Ad is loading...
FSMUX vs TFILX
FSMUX vs TFILX Comparison
Open Charts FSMUX vs TFILX
Strategic Advisers Municipal Bond
Price$8.58
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets11.66B
T. Rowe Price Tax Free Income I
Price$9.09
Change+$0.01 (+0.11%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.24B
FSMUX vs TFILX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMUX has more cash in the bank: 11.7B vs. TFILX (2.24B). FSMUX pays higher dividends than TFILX: FSMUX (3.76) vs TFILX (3.56). FSMUX was incepted earlier than TFILX: FSMUX (4 years) vs TFILX (8 years). FSMUX (0.44) is less costly to investors than TFILX (0.35). FSMUX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 48.00 vs. TFILX (25.00). FSMUX has a lower initial minimum investment than TFILX: FSMUX (0) vs TFILX (500000). FSMUX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 1.37 vs. TFILX (1.12).
| FSMUX | TFILX | FSMUX / TFILX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.19 | 0.35 | 54% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.44 | 0.35 | 126% |
| Fund Existence | 4 years | 8 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -2.239 | -2.533 | 88% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 500000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 11.7B | 2.24B | 522% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.76 | 3.56 | 106% |
| Returns for 1 year | 1.37 | 1.12 | 123% |
| Returns for 3 years | 5.29 | 4.67 | 113% |
| Returns for 5 years | N/A | 4.41 | - |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers