Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSMVX vs JVMCX
FSMVX vs JVMCX Comparison
Open Charts FSMVX vs JVMCX
JHancock Disciplined Value Mid Cap C
Price$26.48
Change+$0.26 (+0.99%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets21.72B
FSMVX vs JVMCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMVX vs. JVMCX commentary
Jun 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMVX is a Buy and JVMCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
JVMCX has more cash in the bank: 21.7B vs. FSMVX (1.75B). FSMVX pays higher dividends than JVMCX: FSMVX (0.91) vs JVMCX (0.00). FSMVX was incepted earlier than JVMCX: FSMVX (24 years) vs JVMCX (14 years). JVMCX (1.88) is less costly to investors than FSMVX (0.83). FSMVX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 96.00 vs. JVMCX (49.00). FSMVX has a lower initial minimum investment than JVMCX: FSMVX (0) vs JVMCX (1000). JVMCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -2.20 vs. FSMVX (-3.83). FSMVX return over 5 years is better than : 70.90 vs. JVMCX (54.53).
| FSMVX | JVMCX | FSMVX / JVMCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.83 | 1.87 | 44% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.83 | 1.88 | 44% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -4.245 | 3.636 | -117% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.75B | 21.7B | 8% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.91 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -3.83 | -2.20 | 174% |
| Returns for 3 years | 18.60 | 13.62 | 137% |
| Returns for 5 years | 70.90 | 54.53 | 130% |
| Returns for 10 years | 23.09 | 30.79 | 75% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement