Ad is loading...
FSNPX vs RADTX
FSNPX vs RADTX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSNPX vs. RADTX commentary
May 01, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSNPX is a Hold and RADTX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RADTX has more cash in the bank: 32.1B vs. FSNPX (19.3B). FSNPX pays higher dividends than RADTX: FSNPX (2.42) vs RADTX (1.73). FSNPX was incepted earlier than RADTX: FSNPX (8 years) vs RADTX (18 years). RADTX (1.40) is less costly to investors than FSNPX (0.53). FSNPX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 14.00 vs. RADTX (10.00). FSNPX has a lower initial minimum investment than RADTX: FSNPX (0) vs RADTX (250). FSNPX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.66 vs. RADTX (6.90). RADTX return over 5 years is better than : 21.45 vs. FSNPX (18.69).
| FSNPX | RADTX | FSNPX / RADTX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.53 | 1.40 | 38% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.53 | 1.40 | 38% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 18 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.057 | 2.090 | 98% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 19.3B | 32.1B | 60% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.42 | 1.73 | 140% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.66 | 6.90 | 111% |
| Returns for 3 years | 10.12 | 10.75 | 94% |
| Returns for 5 years | 18.69 | 21.45 | 87% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 27.62 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers