Ad is loading...
FSNPX vs REDTX
FSNPX vs REDTX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSNPX vs. REDTX commentary
Mar 11, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSNPX is a Hold and REDTX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
REDTX has more cash in the bank: 33B vs. FSNPX (20.3B). REDTX pays higher dividends than FSNPX: REDTX (2.70) vs FSNPX (2.38). FSNPX was incepted earlier than REDTX: FSNPX (8 years) vs REDTX (18 years). FSNPX (0.53) is less costly to investors than REDTX (0.36). FSNPX has a lower initial minimum investment than REDTX: FSNPX (0) vs REDTX (250). REDTX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.16 vs. FSNPX (5.11). REDTX return over 5 years is better than : 23.76 vs. FSNPX (12.93).
| FSNPX | REDTX | FSNPX / REDTX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.53 | 0.36 | 147% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.53 | 0.36 | 147% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 18 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.425 | 2.689 | 90% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 20.3B | 33B | 62% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.38 | 2.70 | 88% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.11 | 6.16 | 83% |
| Returns for 3 years | 7.20 | 11.34 | 64% |
| Returns for 5 years | 12.93 | 23.76 | 54% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 40.30 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers