Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSNPX vs REDTX
FSNPX vs REDTX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSNPX vs. REDTX commentary
Jun 25, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSNPX is a Hold and REDTX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
REDTX has more cash in the bank: 32.4B vs. FSNPX (19.4B). REDTX pays higher dividends than FSNPX: REDTX (2.66) vs FSNPX (2.37). FSNPX was incepted earlier than REDTX: FSNPX (8 years) vs REDTX (18 years). FSNPX (0.52) is less costly to investors than REDTX (0.36). FSNPX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 15.00 vs. REDTX (10.00). FSNPX has a lower initial minimum investment than REDTX: FSNPX (0) vs REDTX (250). REDTX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.16 vs. FSNPX (5.16). REDTX return over 5 years is better than : 24.14 vs. FSNPX (15.31).
| FSNPX | REDTX | FSNPX / REDTX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.52 | 0.36 | 144% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.52 | 0.36 | 144% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 18 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.742 | 5.770 | 65% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 19.4B | 32.4B | 60% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.37 | 2.66 | 89% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.16 | 7.16 | 72% |
| Returns for 3 years | 23.81 | 21.57 | 110% |
| Returns for 5 years | 15.31 | 24.14 | 63% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 40.74 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers