Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSOAX vs MVCAX
FSOAX vs MVCAX Comparison
Open Charts FSOAX vs MVCAX
Fidelity Advisor Value Strategies A
Price$44.97
Change+$0.93 (+2.11%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.69B
FSOAX vs MVCAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSOAX vs. MVCAX commentary
Nov 26, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSOAX is a Buy and MVCAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MVCAX has more cash in the bank: 16.6B vs. FSOAX (1.69B). MVCAX pays higher dividends than FSOAX: MVCAX (0.85) vs FSOAX (0.80). FSOAX was incepted earlier than MVCAX: FSOAX (29 years) vs MVCAX (24 years). FSOAX (1.09) is less costly to investors than MVCAX (1.00). FSOAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 61.00 vs. MVCAX (27.00). FSOAX (6%) and MVCAX (6%) have equivalent initial investment costs. FSOAX has a lower initial minimum investment than MVCAX: FSOAX (0) vs MVCAX (1000). MVCAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -11.26 vs. FSOAX (-16.03). FSOAX return over 5 years is better than : 36.97 vs. MVCAX (32.89).
| FSOAX | MVCAX | FSOAX / MVCAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.09 | 0.99 | 110% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.09 | 1.00 | 109% |
| Fund Existence | 29 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.562 | 4.954 | 52% |
| Front Load | 6% | 6% | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.69B | 16.6B | 10% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.80 | 0.85 | 94% |
| Returns for 1 year | -16.03 | -11.26 | 142% |
| Returns for 3 years | 10.48 | 10.95 | 96% |
| Returns for 5 years | 36.97 | 32.89 | 112% |
| Returns for 10 years | 16.91 | 69.99 | 24% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement