Ad is loading...
FSOAX vs MVCAX
FSOAX vs MVCAX Comparison
Open Charts FSOAX vs MVCAX
Fidelity Advisor Value Strategies A
Price$39.00
Change+$0.69 (+1.80%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.67B
FSOAX vs MVCAX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSOAX vs. MVCAX commentary
May 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSOAX is a Buy and MVCAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MVCAX has more cash in the bank: 16.3B vs. FSOAX (1.67B). MVCAX (0.93) and FSOAX (0.92) have matching dividends . FSOAX was incepted earlier than MVCAX: FSOAX (29 years) vs MVCAX (24 years). FSOAX (1.09) is less costly to investors than MVCAX (1.00). FSOAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 61.00 vs. MVCAX (27.00). FSOAX (6%) and MVCAX (6%) have equivalent initial investment costs. FSOAX has a lower initial minimum investment than MVCAX: FSOAX (0) vs MVCAX (1000). MVCAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -8.27 vs. FSOAX (-17.40). FSOAX return over 5 years is better than : 64.87 vs. MVCAX (56.76).
| FSOAX | MVCAX | FSOAX / MVCAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.09 | 0.99 | 110% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.09 | 1.00 | 109% |
| Fund Existence | 29 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -10.782 | -5.150 | 209% |
| Front Load | 6% | 6% | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.67B | 16.3B | 10% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.92 | 0.93 | 99% |
| Returns for 1 year | -17.40 | -8.27 | 210% |
| Returns for 3 years | -0.62 | 4.61 | -14% |
| Returns for 5 years | 64.87 | 56.76 | 114% |
| Returns for 10 years | -3.08 | 49.35 | -6% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers