Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSOSX vs RERBX
FSOSX vs RERBX Comparison
Open Charts FSOSX vs RERBX
Fidelity Series Overseas
Price$16.11
Change+$0.05 (+0.31%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets15.78B
American Funds EUPAC R2
Price$57.18
Change+$0.12 (+0.21%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets134.36B
FSOSX vs RERBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSOSX vs. RERBX commentary
Jul 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSOSX is a StrongBuy and RERBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RERBX has more cash in the bank: 134B vs. FSOSX (15.8B). FSOSX pays higher dividends than RERBX: FSOSX (1.87) vs RERBX (0.25). FSOSX was incepted earlier than RERBX: FSOSX (6 years) vs RERBX (23 years). RERBX (1.56) is less costly to investors than FSOSX (0.01). FSOSX (36.00) and RERBX (35.00) have comparable annual turnover. FSOSX has a lower initial minimum investment than RERBX: FSOSX (0) vs RERBX (250). FSOSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 14.98 vs. RERBX (4.13). FSOSX return over 5 years is better than : 66.07 vs. RERBX (12.48).
| FSOSX | RERBX | FSOSX / RERBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.01 | 1.56 | 1% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.01 | 1.56 | 1% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 19.494 | 12.448 | 157% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 15.8B | 134B | 12% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.87 | 0.25 | 746% |
| Returns for 1 year | 14.98 | 4.13 | 363% |
| Returns for 3 years | 62.38 | 26.84 | 232% |
| Returns for 5 years | 66.07 | 12.48 | 529% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 21.39 | - |