Ad is loading...
FSPHX vs FTDZX
FSPHX vs FTDZX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSPHX vs. FTDZX commentary
May 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSPHX is a Hold and FTDZX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSPHX has more cash in the bank: 6.2B vs. FTDZX (645M). FSPHX pays higher dividends than FTDZX: FSPHX (0.02) vs FTDZX (0.00). FSPHX was incepted earlier than FTDZX: FSPHX (44 years) vs FTDZX (16 years). FTDZX (0.81) is less costly to investors than FSPHX (0.63). FSPHX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 40.00 vs. FTDZX (35.87). FSPHX has a lower initial minimum investment than FTDZX: FSPHX (0) vs FTDZX (100000). FSPHX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -11.31 vs. FTDZX (-20.91). FSPHX return over 5 years is better than : -11.47 vs. FTDZX (-29.26).
| FSPHX | FTDZX | FSPHX / FTDZX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 0.80 | 79% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 0.81 | 78% |
| Fund Existence | 44 years | 16 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -7.229 | -11.677 | 62% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 100000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 6.2B | 645M | 962% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.02 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -11.31 | -20.91 | 54% |
| Returns for 3 years | 5.18 | 19.89 | 26% |
| Returns for 5 years | -11.47 | -29.26 | 39% |
| Returns for 10 years | 8.19 | -41.02 | -20% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...