Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSPHX vs FTDZX
FSPHX vs FTDZX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSPHX vs. FTDZX commentary
Sep 17, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSPHX is a Hold and FTDZX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSPHX has more cash in the bank: 5.88B vs. FTDZX (793M). FSPHX pays higher dividends than FTDZX: FSPHX (0.02) vs FTDZX (0.00). FSPHX was incepted earlier than FTDZX: FSPHX (44 years) vs FTDZX (16 years). FTDZX (0.81) is less costly to investors than FSPHX (0.63). FSPHX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 40.00 vs. FTDZX (21.87). FSPHX has a lower initial minimum investment than FTDZX: FSPHX (0) vs FTDZX (100000). FTDZX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -5.82 vs. FSPHX (-15.47). FSPHX return over 5 years is better than : -14.06 vs. FTDZX (-19.71).
| FSPHX | FTDZX | FSPHX / FTDZX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 0.80 | 79% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 0.81 | 78% |
| Fund Existence | 44 years | 16 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -1.284 | 15.734 | -8% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 100000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 5.88B | 793M | 742% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.02 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -15.47 | -5.82 | 266% |
| Returns for 3 years | -1.34 | 34.91 | -4% |
| Returns for 5 years | -14.06 | -19.71 | 71% |
| Returns for 10 years | 18.83 | -25.01 | -75% |