Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSPHX vs FTDZX
FSPHX vs FTDZX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSPHX vs. FTDZX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSPHX is a Hold and FTDZX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSPHX has more cash in the bank: 6.22B vs. FTDZX (1B). FSPHX pays higher dividends than FTDZX: FSPHX (0.02) vs FTDZX (0.00). FSPHX was incepted earlier than FTDZX: FSPHX (44 years) vs FTDZX (16 years). FTDZX (0.78) is less costly to investors than FSPHX (0.63). FSPHX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 40.00 vs. FTDZX (21.87). FSPHX has a lower initial minimum investment than FTDZX: FSPHX (0) vs FTDZX (100000). FTDZX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 31.70 vs. FSPHX (0.02). FTDZX return over 5 years is better than : 0.52 vs. FSPHX (-8.84).
| FSPHX | FTDZX | FSPHX / FTDZX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 0.77 | 82% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 0.78 | 81% |
| Fund Existence | 44 years | 16 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.532 | 47.614 | 22% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 100000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 6.22B | 1B | 620% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.02 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 0.02 | 31.70 | 0% |
| Returns for 3 years | 10.47 | 67.20 | 16% |
| Returns for 5 years | -8.84 | 0.52 | -1,686% |
| Returns for 10 years | 39.34 | 7.73 | 509% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement