Ad is loading...
FSPHX vs FTDZX
FSPHX vs FTDZX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSPHX vs. FTDZX commentary
Apr 05, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSPHX is a Hold and FTDZX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSPHX has more cash in the bank: 6.42B vs. FTDZX (706M). FSPHX pays higher dividends than FTDZX: FSPHX (0.02) vs FTDZX (0.00). FSPHX was incepted earlier than FTDZX: FSPHX (44 years) vs FTDZX (16 years). FTDZX (0.81) is less costly to investors than FSPHX (0.65). FSPHX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 46.00 vs. FTDZX (35.87). FSPHX has a lower initial minimum investment than FTDZX: FSPHX (0) vs FTDZX (100000). FSPHX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -9.61 vs. FTDZX (-17.00). FSPHX return over 5 years is better than : 10.17 vs. FTDZX (-9.21).
| FSPHX | FTDZX | FSPHX / FTDZX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 0.80 | 81% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 0.81 | 80% |
| Fund Existence | 44 years | 16 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -1.064 | -5.815 | 18% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 100000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 6.42B | 706M | 909% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.02 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -9.61 | -17.00 | 57% |
| Returns for 3 years | -10.12 | -1.29 | 785% |
| Returns for 5 years | 10.17 | -9.21 | -110% |
| Returns for 10 years | 11.87 | -36.68 | -32% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...