Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSPHX vs FTDZX
FSPHX vs FTDZX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSPHX vs. FTDZX commentary
Jun 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSPHX is a Buy and FTDZX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSPHX has more cash in the bank: 5.86B vs. FTDZX (691M). FSPHX pays higher dividends than FTDZX: FSPHX (0.02) vs FTDZX (0.00). FSPHX was incepted earlier than FTDZX: FSPHX (44 years) vs FTDZX (16 years). FTDZX (0.81) is less costly to investors than FSPHX (0.63). FSPHX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 40.00 vs. FTDZX (35.87). FSPHX has a lower initial minimum investment than FTDZX: FSPHX (0) vs FTDZX (100000). FSPHX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -12.67 vs. FTDZX (-15.81). FSPHX return over 5 years is better than : -13.93 vs. FTDZX (-26.69).
| FSPHX | FTDZX | FSPHX / FTDZX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 0.80 | 79% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 0.81 | 78% |
| Fund Existence | 44 years | 16 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -7.266 | -4.144 | 175% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 100000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 5.86B | 691M | 848% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.02 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -12.67 | -15.81 | 80% |
| Returns for 3 years | -1.50 | 20.73 | -7% |
| Returns for 5 years | -13.93 | -26.69 | 52% |
| Returns for 10 years | 8.04 | -38.17 | -21% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement