Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSPHX vs HGHIX
FSPHX vs HGHIX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSPHX vs. HGHIX commentary
Jun 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSPHX is a Buy and HGHIX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSPHX has more cash in the bank: 5.86B vs. HGHIX (806M). HGHIX pays higher dividends than FSPHX: HGHIX (0.45) vs FSPHX (0.02). FSPHX was incepted earlier than HGHIX: FSPHX (44 years) vs HGHIX (19 years). HGHIX (1.02) is less costly to investors than FSPHX (0.63). FSPHX (40.00) and HGHIX (40.00) have comparable annual turnover. FSPHX has a lower initial minimum investment than HGHIX: FSPHX (0) vs HGHIX (2000). FSPHX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -11.63 vs. HGHIX (-14.48). HGHIX return over 5 years is better than : -8.28 vs. FSPHX (-10.17).
| FSPHX | HGHIX | FSPHX / HGHIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 1.02 | 62% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 1.02 | 62% |
| Fund Existence | 44 years | 19 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -6.165 | -3.985 | 155% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 5.86B | 806M | 727% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.02 | 0.45 | 4% |
| Returns for 1 year | -11.63 | -14.48 | 80% |
| Returns for 3 years | 9.95 | 8.05 | 124% |
| Returns for 5 years | -10.17 | -8.28 | 123% |
| Returns for 10 years | 8.56 | -12.90 | -66% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers