Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSPHX vs HGHIX
FSPHX vs HGHIX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSPHX vs. HGHIX commentary
May 23, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSPHX is a Buy and HGHIX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSPHX has more cash in the bank: 6.2B vs. HGHIX (794M). HGHIX pays higher dividends than FSPHX: HGHIX (0.43) vs FSPHX (0.02). FSPHX was incepted earlier than HGHIX: FSPHX (44 years) vs HGHIX (19 years). HGHIX (1.02) is less costly to investors than FSPHX (0.63). FSPHX (40.00) and HGHIX (40.00) have comparable annual turnover. FSPHX has a lower initial minimum investment than HGHIX: FSPHX (0) vs HGHIX (2000). FSPHX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -14.20 vs. HGHIX (-17.15). HGHIX return over 5 years is better than : -13.78 vs. FSPHX (-14.75).
| FSPHX | HGHIX | FSPHX / HGHIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 1.02 | 62% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 1.02 | 62% |
| Fund Existence | 44 years | 19 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -9.174 | -7.472 | 123% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 6.2B | 794M | 781% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.02 | 0.43 | 4% |
| Returns for 1 year | -14.20 | -17.15 | 83% |
| Returns for 3 years | -2.27 | -4.44 | 51% |
| Returns for 5 years | -14.75 | -13.78 | 107% |
| Returns for 10 years | 3.75 | -15.29 | -25% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement