Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSPHX vs HGHIX
FSPHX vs HGHIX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSPHX vs. HGHIX commentary
Oct 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSPHX is a Buy and HGHIX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSPHX has more cash in the bank: 5.96B vs. HGHIX (796M). HGHIX pays higher dividends than FSPHX: HGHIX (0.42) vs FSPHX (0.02). FSPHX was incepted earlier than HGHIX: FSPHX (44 years) vs HGHIX (19 years). HGHIX (1.02) is less costly to investors than FSPHX (0.63). FSPHX (40.00) and HGHIX (40.00) have comparable annual turnover. FSPHX has a lower initial minimum investment than HGHIX: FSPHX (0) vs HGHIX (2000). FSPHX (-9.53) and HGHIX (-9.77) have marching annual gain over last year. HGHIX return over 5 years is better than : -13.45 vs. FSPHX (-14.37).
| FSPHX | HGHIX | FSPHX / HGHIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 1.02 | 62% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 1.02 | 62% |
| Fund Existence | 44 years | 19 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.303 | 4.248 | 78% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 5.96B | 796M | 749% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.02 | 0.42 | 4% |
| Returns for 1 year | -9.53 | -9.77 | 97% |
| Returns for 3 years | 7.01 | 12.49 | 56% |
| Returns for 5 years | -14.37 | -13.45 | 107% |
| Returns for 10 years | 36.08 | 3.81 | 948% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement