Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSPHX vs HGHIX
FSPHX vs HGHIX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSPHX vs. HGHIX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSPHX is a Hold and HGHIX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSPHX has more cash in the bank: 6.22B vs. HGHIX (834M). HGHIX pays higher dividends than FSPHX: HGHIX (0.40) vs FSPHX (0.02). FSPHX was incepted earlier than HGHIX: FSPHX (44 years) vs HGHIX (19 years). HGHIX (1.02) is less costly to investors than FSPHX (0.63). FSPHX (40.00) and HGHIX (40.00) have comparable annual turnover. FSPHX has a lower initial minimum investment than HGHIX: FSPHX (0) vs HGHIX (2000). HGHIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.07 vs. FSPHX (0.02). HGHIX return over 5 years is better than : -7.98 vs. FSPHX (-8.84).
| FSPHX | HGHIX | FSPHX / HGHIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 1.02 | 62% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 1.02 | 62% |
| Fund Existence | 44 years | 19 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.532 | 12.349 | 85% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 6.22B | 834M | 745% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.02 | 0.40 | 4% |
| Returns for 1 year | 0.02 | 5.07 | 0% |
| Returns for 3 years | 10.47 | 13.02 | 80% |
| Returns for 5 years | -8.84 | -7.98 | 111% |
| Returns for 10 years | 39.34 | 4.49 | 877% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement