Ad is loading...
FSPHX vs HGHVX
FSPHX vs HGHVX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSPHX vs. HGHVX commentary
Apr 11, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSPHX is a Hold and HGHVX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSPHX has more cash in the bank: 6.42B vs. HGHVX (824M). HGHVX pays higher dividends than FSPHX: HGHVX (0.46) vs FSPHX (0.02). FSPHX was incepted earlier than HGHVX: FSPHX (44 years) vs HGHVX (6 years). HGHVX (0.91) is less costly to investors than FSPHX (0.65). FSPHX (0) and HGHVX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. HGHVX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -15.06 vs. FSPHX (-17.51). HGHVX return over 5 years is better than : -1.76 vs. FSPHX (-3.60).
| FSPHX | HGHVX | FSPHX / HGHVX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 0.91 | 71% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 0.91 | 71% |
| Fund Existence | 44 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -8.807 | -7.786 | 113% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 6.42B | 824M | 779% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.02 | 0.46 | 4% |
| Returns for 1 year | -17.51 | -15.06 | 116% |
| Returns for 3 years | -16.12 | -15.04 | 107% |
| Returns for 5 years | -3.60 | -1.76 | 205% |
| Returns for 10 years | 3.99 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...