Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSPHX vs HGHVX
FSPHX vs HGHVX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSPHX vs. HGHVX commentary
Jun 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSPHX is a Buy and HGHVX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSPHX has more cash in the bank: 5.86B vs. HGHVX (801M). HGHVX pays higher dividends than FSPHX: HGHVX (0.50) vs FSPHX (0.02). FSPHX was incepted earlier than HGHVX: FSPHX (44 years) vs HGHVX (6 years). HGHVX (0.92) is less costly to investors than FSPHX (0.63). FSPHX (40.00) and HGHVX (40.00) have comparable annual turnover. FSPHX (0) and HGHVX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FSPHX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -12.67 vs. HGHVX (-15.64). HGHVX return over 5 years is better than : -11.18 vs. FSPHX (-13.93).
| FSPHX | HGHVX | FSPHX / HGHVX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 0.92 | 68% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 0.92 | 68% |
| Fund Existence | 44 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -7.266 | -5.713 | 127% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 5.86B | 801M | 732% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.02 | 0.50 | 4% |
| Returns for 1 year | -12.67 | -15.64 | 81% |
| Returns for 3 years | -1.50 | -2.62 | 57% |
| Returns for 5 years | -13.93 | -11.18 | 125% |
| Returns for 10 years | 8.04 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers