Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSPHX vs HGHYX
FSPHX vs HGHYX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSPHX vs. HGHYX commentary
Jul 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSPHX is a Hold and HGHYX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSPHX has more cash in the bank: 5.92B vs. HGHYX (773M). HGHYX pays higher dividends than FSPHX: HGHYX (0.35) vs FSPHX (0.02). FSPHX was incepted earlier than HGHYX: FSPHX (44 years) vs HGHYX (25 years). HGHYX (1.03) is less costly to investors than FSPHX (0.63). FSPHX (40.00) and HGHYX (40.00) have comparable annual turnover. FSPHX has a lower initial minimum investment than HGHYX: FSPHX (0) vs HGHYX (250000). FSPHX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -15.89 vs. HGHYX (-18.59). HGHYX return over 5 years is better than : -15.41 vs. FSPHX (-18.69).
| FSPHX | HGHYX | FSPHX / HGHYX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 1.03 | 61% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 1.03 | 61% |
| Fund Existence | 44 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -6.312 | -5.643 | 112% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 5.92B | 773M | 766% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.02 | 0.35 | 5% |
| Returns for 1 year | -15.89 | -18.59 | 85% |
| Returns for 3 years | -1.14 | -1.23 | 93% |
| Returns for 5 years | -18.69 | -15.41 | 121% |
| Returns for 10 years | 4.07 | -13.61 | -30% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement