Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSPHX vs HLHIX
FSPHX vs HLHIX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSPHX vs. HLHIX commentary
Jun 15, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSPHX is a Buy and HLHIX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSPHX has more cash in the bank: 5.86B vs. HLHIX (106M). FSPHX pays higher dividends than HLHIX: FSPHX (0.02) vs HLHIX (0.00). FSPHX was incepted earlier than HLHIX: FSPHX (44 years) vs HLHIX (10 years). HLHIX (1.12) is less costly to investors than FSPHX (0.63). FSPHX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 40.00 vs. HLHIX (6.00). FSPHX has a lower initial minimum investment than HLHIX: FSPHX (0) vs HLHIX (1000000). FSPHX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -12.08 vs. HLHIX (-14.09). FSPHX return over 5 years is better than : -10.63 vs. HLHIX (-17.65).
| FSPHX | HLHIX | FSPHX / HLHIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 1.05 | 60% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 1.12 | 56% |
| Fund Existence | 44 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -6.642 | -4.181 | 159% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 5.86B | 106M | 5,531% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.02 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -12.08 | -14.09 | 86% |
| Returns for 3 years | 9.39 | -4.55 | -207% |
| Returns for 5 years | -10.63 | -17.65 | 60% |
| Returns for 10 years | 8.01 | -27.69 | -29% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement