Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSPHX vs HLHIX
FSPHX vs HLHIX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSPHX vs. HLHIX commentary
Aug 02, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSPHX is a Hold and HLHIX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSPHX has more cash in the bank: 5.74B vs. HLHIX (98.6M). FSPHX pays higher dividends than HLHIX: FSPHX (0.02) vs HLHIX (0.00). FSPHX was incepted earlier than HLHIX: FSPHX (44 years) vs HLHIX (11 years). HLHIX (1.12) is less costly to investors than FSPHX (0.63). FSPHX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 40.00 vs. HLHIX (6.00). FSPHX has a lower initial minimum investment than HLHIX: FSPHX (0) vs HLHIX (1000000). FSPHX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -15.17 vs. HLHIX (-16.90). FSPHX return over 5 years is better than : -17.05 vs. HLHIX (-26.46).
| FSPHX | HLHIX | FSPHX / HLHIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 1.05 | 60% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 1.12 | 56% |
| Fund Existence | 44 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -6.532 | -7.805 | 84% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 5.74B | 98.6M | 5,816% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.02 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -15.17 | -16.90 | 90% |
| Returns for 3 years | -6.93 | -16.82 | 41% |
| Returns for 5 years | -17.05 | -26.46 | 64% |
| Returns for 10 years | 4.85 | -33.60 | -14% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement