Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSPHX vs HLHIX
FSPHX vs HLHIX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSPHX vs. HLHIX commentary
Oct 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSPHX is a Buy and HLHIX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSPHX has more cash in the bank: 5.96B vs. HLHIX (99.4M). FSPHX pays higher dividends than HLHIX: FSPHX (0.02) vs HLHIX (0.00). FSPHX was incepted earlier than HLHIX: FSPHX (44 years) vs HLHIX (11 years). HLHIX (1.12) is less costly to investors than FSPHX (0.63). FSPHX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 40.00 vs. HLHIX (6.00). FSPHX has a lower initial minimum investment than HLHIX: FSPHX (0) vs HLHIX (1000000). HLHIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -8.59 vs. FSPHX (-10.39). FSPHX return over 5 years is better than : -13.76 vs. HLHIX (-23.20).
| FSPHX | HLHIX | FSPHX / HLHIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 1.05 | 60% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 1.12 | 56% |
| Fund Existence | 44 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.376 | -0.976 | -346% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 5.96B | 99.4M | 6,000% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.02 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -10.39 | -8.59 | 121% |
| Returns for 3 years | 7.09 | 1.03 | 688% |
| Returns for 5 years | -13.76 | -23.20 | 59% |
| Returns for 10 years | 36.17 | -18.05 | -200% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement