Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSPHX vs HLHIX
FSPHX vs HLHIX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSPHX vs. HLHIX commentary
May 23, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSPHX is a Buy and HLHIX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSPHX has more cash in the bank: 6.2B vs. HLHIX (104M). FSPHX pays higher dividends than HLHIX: FSPHX (0.02) vs HLHIX (0.00). FSPHX was incepted earlier than HLHIX: FSPHX (44 years) vs HLHIX (10 years). HLHIX (1.12) is less costly to investors than FSPHX (0.63). FSPHX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 40.00 vs. HLHIX (6.00). FSPHX has a lower initial minimum investment than HLHIX: FSPHX (0) vs HLHIX (1000000). FSPHX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -14.20 vs. HLHIX (-15.65). FSPHX return over 5 years is better than : -14.75 vs. HLHIX (-22.52).
| FSPHX | HLHIX | FSPHX / HLHIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 1.05 | 60% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 1.12 | 56% |
| Fund Existence | 44 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -9.174 | -6.272 | 146% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 6.2B | 104M | 5,963% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.02 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -14.20 | -15.65 | 91% |
| Returns for 3 years | -2.27 | -13.70 | 17% |
| Returns for 5 years | -14.75 | -22.52 | 66% |
| Returns for 10 years | 3.75 | -28.67 | -13% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement